Independent and interacting electron models

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the treatment of electrons as independent and non-interacting in solid state physics, specifically in the context of models like the Fermi Gas and the implications of interactions among electrons. Participants explore the differences between mean-field theory and density functional theory, while also addressing the concept of quasiparticles and the adiabatic switching procedure in transitioning from non-interacting to interacting systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why electrons can be treated as independent and non-interacting in solid state physics, suggesting that this is a simplification that may not always hold true.
  • One participant describes the Fermi Gas model, explaining that it allows for the calculation of energy spectra in a non-interacting system, and discusses the adiabatic evolution of eigenstates when interactions are introduced.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the quasiparticle description arises from this adiabatic evolution, indicating that while electrons are not truly independent, they can be treated as such under certain conditions.
  • There is mention of "Landau's adiabatic switching on procedure" as a method to achieve the quasiparticle description, though some caveats are acknowledged regarding its necessity and applicability.
  • Some participants note that the assumption of treating electrons as non-interacting is not universally valid, leading to discussions about "normal" versus "non-normal" Fermi liquids.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of treating electrons as independent and non-interacting, with some agreeing that this is an assumption that may not always apply. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the conditions under which this assumption holds true.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific assumptions about the system being discussed, as well as the potential for varying interpretations of quasiparticle behavior in different contexts.

Nusc
Messages
752
Reaction score
2
Why is it that we can treat electrons as independent and non-interacting in solid state physics?

What is the difference between mean-field theory and density functional theory?
In lame terms please.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay forget lame terms.
 
Nusc said:
Why is it that we can treat electrons as independent and non-interacting in solid state physics?

Suppose you're considering a system of noninteracting fermions (e.g., electrons with no coulomb interactions), called a Fermi Gas. Since this system is non-interacting, it's possible to solve for the energy spectrum of this system. In a real system, of course, the electrons are interacting, so imagine that you started with this Fermi gas system and slowly turned on the coulomb interaction. In doing so, the eigenstates of the Fermi Gas system (that is, the various characteristic energy states of the system) will evolve adiabatically into the eigenstates of the interacting system. So, there is a mapping from the eigenstates of the non-interacting system to the eigenstates of the interacting system. Strictly speaking, then, electrons themselves aren't actually treated as independent and non-interacting - the system is actually described in terms of "quasiparticles", elementary excitations of the system with the same quantum numbers as the non-interacting electrons, which may be treated as non-interacting. The quasiparticle description is obtained through this adiabatic evolution of eigenstates.

This process is called "Landau's adiabatic switching on procedure". There are some caveats I didn't mention, mainly because I don't remember them all but also because they wouldn't be too enlightening as part of a basic description. If I recall correctly this switching-on procedure isn't strictly necessary, but is the fastest way to get to the quasiparticle description of the system.
 
Mute said:
Suppose you're considering a system of noninteracting fermions (e.g., electrons with no coulomb interactions), called a Fermi Gas. Since this system is non-interacting, it's possible to solve for the energy spectrum of this system. In a real system, of course, the electrons are interacting, so imagine that you started with this Fermi gas system and slowly turned on the coulomb interaction. In doing so, the eigenstates of the Fermi Gas system (that is, the various characteristic energy states of the system) will evolve adiabatically into the eigenstates of the interacting system.

Sometimes this is the case, and sometime it is not. this is actually an assumption, which does not always turn out to be true. If the assumption is true then we say we are dealing with a "normal" Fermi liquid.

So, there is a mapping from the eigenstates of the non-interacting system to the eigenstates of the interacting system. Strictly speaking, then, electrons themselves aren't actually treated as independent and non-interacting - the system is actually described in terms of "quasiparticles", elementary excitations of the system with the same quantum numbers as the non-interacting electrons, which may be treated as non-interacting. The quasiparticle description is obtained through this adiabatic evolution of eigenstates.

This process is called "Landau's adiabatic switching on procedure". There are some caveats I didn't mention, mainly because I don't remember them all but also because they wouldn't be too enlightening as part of a basic description. If I recall correctly this switching-on procedure isn't strictly necessary, but is the fastest way to get to the quasiparticle description of the system.
 
olgranpappy said:
Sometimes this is the case, and sometime it is not. this is actually an assumption, which does not always turn out to be true. If the assumption is true then we say we are dealing with a "normal" Fermi liquid.

Yes, this is one of the caveats I didn't mention, since I don't know much about non-normal Fermi Liquids.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K