Index (killing form ?) in a reducible representation

  • I
  • Thread starter hideelo
  • Start date
  • #1
91
14

Main Question or Discussion Point

In Chapter 70 of Srednicki's QFT he discusses what he calls the index of a representation T(R) defined by

Tr(TaR TbR) = T(R)δab

I think other places call this a killing form, but I may be mistaken. In any case he discusses reducible representations R = R1⊕R2. He then states (eqn 70.11) that dim R = dim R1 + dim R2 which is obvious. He then states (eqn 70.12) that T(R) = T(R1) + T(R2) which is what I want to know about. Is this (70.12) a result or an assertion? If it's a result, how do I see it? If it's an assertion, then why do we make this choice?


TIA
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
13,108
9,868
In Chapter 70 of Srednicki's QFT he discusses what he calls the index of a representation T(R) defined by

Tr(TaR TbR) = T(R)δab

I think other places call this a killing form, but I may be mistaken. In any case he discusses reducible representations R = R1⊕R2. He then states (eqn 70.11) that dim R = dim R1 + dim R2 which is obvious. He then states (eqn 70.12) that T(R) = T(R1) + T(R2) which is what I want to know about. Is this (70.12) a result or an assertion? If it's a result, how do I see it? If it's an assertion, then why do we make this choice?


TIA
If you have a direct sum of vector spaces, on which something operates in a way, that leaves both subspaces ##R_i## invariant, then this operation can be written in block matrix form ##T_R= \begin{bmatrix}T_{R_1}&0\\0&T_{R_2}\end{bmatrix}## and the traces can be added.
 

Related Threads on Index (killing form ?) in a reducible representation

  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
420
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
Top