Index of Positivity in Quadratic Form: $f(X) = \sum^{n}_{i=1} x_{2}^{i}$

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter A.Magnus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Index
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The index of positivity for the quadratic form defined by the function $f: \mathbb R^n \rightarrow \mathbb R, \ f(X) = \sum^{n}_{i=1} x_{2}^{i} + \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i \neq j}x_ix_j$ is confirmed to be $n$. This conclusion is based on the canonical form of the quadratic expression, which consists of $n$ positive square terms and additional mixed terms. The method of determining the index involves counting the number of positive terms in the canonical form, which supports the assertion that the index is indeed $n$.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quadratic forms and their properties.
  • Familiarity with canonical forms in linear algebra.
  • Knowledge of positive definiteness and indices of positivity.
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation and summation notation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of quadratic forms in linear algebra.
  • Learn about canonical forms and their applications in determining positivity.
  • Research the concept of positive definiteness in matrices.
  • Explore advanced topics in multivariable calculus related to quadratic forms.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying linear algebra, and researchers interested in the properties of quadratic forms and their applications in optimization and analysis.

A.Magnus
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
I am working on this problem: Show that the index of positivity is $n$ for this quadratic form:

$$f: \mathbb R^n \rightarrow \mathbb R, \ f(X) = \sum^{n}_{i=1} x_{2}^{i} + \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i \neq j}x_ix_j.$$

Here is a solution I got from other sources: Since the index of quadratic form is the number of positive terms (or square terms) of its canonical form, and since the canonical form of $f$ is

$$\big(x_1^2 + x_2^2 + ... + x_n^2 \big)+ \frac{1}{n}\big((x_1x_2 + x_1x_3 + ... + x_1x_n) + (x_2x_3 + x_2x_4 + ... + x_2x_n) + ... \big),$$

therefore the index is $n$.

I have strong doubt that this solution is correct. Is this correct? How do I have to go about if this is wrong? Thank you for your gracious help and time. ~MA
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
MaryAnn said:
I am working on this problem: Show that the index of positivity is $n$ for this quadratic form:

$$f: \mathbb R^n \rightarrow \mathbb R, \ f(X) = \sum^{n}_{i=1} x_{2}^{i} + \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i \neq j}x_ix_j.$$

Here is a solution I got from other sources: Since the index of quadratic form is the number of positive terms (or square terms) of its canonical form, and since the canonical form of $f$ is

$$\big(x_1^2 + x_2^2 + ... + x_n^2 \big)+ \frac{1}{n}\big((x_1x_2 + x_1x_3 + ... + x_1x_n) + (x_2x_3 + x_2x_4 + ... + x_2x_n) + ... \big),$$

therefore the index is $n$.

I have strong doubt that this solution is correct. Is this correct? How do I have to go about if this is wrong? Thank you for your gracious help and time. ~MA

Hey MaryAnn! ;)

I didn't answer yet because I'm not familiar with this index of positivity, and I couldn't find any references to it.
Either way, with the definition you gave, it seems to me that you applied it correctly. (Nod)
 
I like Serena said:
Hey MaryAnn! ;)

I didn't answer yet because I'm not familiar with this index of positivity, and I couldn't find any references to it.
Either way, with the definition you gave, it seems to me that you applied it correctly. (Nod)

Thank you. Let me know if you find any reference to this one. Thanks again for your gracious help. ~MA
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
19K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K