MHB Index Refraction Yell Light Sodium Lamp Liquid 1.92E8m/s

skinnermitch
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The Speed of yellow light( from a sodium lamp) in a certain liquid is measured to be 1.92E8 m/s. What is the index of refraction of this liquid for the light?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
skinnermitch said:
The Speed of yellow light( from a sodium lamp) in a certain liquid is measured to be 1.92E8 m/s. What is the index of refraction of this liquid for the light?

The refractive index for a given medium is given by $$n = \dfrac{c}{v_n}$$Where $$n$$ is the refractive index, $$c$$ is the speed of light in a vacuum defined as ($$299,792,458 \text{ m/s} \approx 3 \times 10^8 \text{ m/s}$$) and $$v_n$$ is the speed of light in the medium in m/s

In your case $$c = 299792458 \text{ m/s}$$ and $$v_n = 1.92 \times 10^8 \text{ m/s}$$

nb: Some books don't mind you using 3E8, others do.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
883
Back
Top