So I am trying to derive a formula from one of the standard summation formulas except starting at a different index. So if I have the series..(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]\sum i = \frac{n(n+1)}{2}[/tex]

Where "i" runs from 1 to n. (I dont know how to put it in the code.) If I want to make the series start from zero, I would use another index equal to, "k=i-1" And now my upper limit will be "n-1" So now I can replace "i" in the sum with "k+1", Shouldn't the new formula for the partial sums be..

[tex]\sum k+1 = \frac{(n-1)(n)}{2} + (n-1)[/tex]

Problem is, it isnt. A simple test will prove this. Whats wrong?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Index shifting in summation FORMULAS

Loading...

Similar Threads - Index shifting summation | Date |
---|---|

I Fourier transform of a sum of shifted Gaussians | Sep 4, 2016 |

I Del in index notation | Sep 1, 2016 |

Tensor/Index notation | Jul 14, 2015 |

Struggling with basic index notation | Nov 7, 2013 |

Notation for partial derivatives using indexes | Jul 13, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**