Induced current problem in COMSOL

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a user encountering issues with induced current density in COMSOL's ac-dc module while trying to analyze the magnetic field generated by a dipole electrode pair in a conductive environment. The user reports that the total current density approaches zero because the induced current density from the magnetic module counteracts the external current density input. Attempts to mitigate this issue included using different boundary conditions and modules, but results remained consistent with minimal magnetic flux observed primarily at the boundaries. The user seeks advice on preventing COMSOL from generating an induced current density that negates their external input. Effective solutions or adjustments to the simulation setup are requested to resolve this challenge.
peagasus
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I'm working on COMSOL's ac-dc module and I'm trying to find the magnetic field which is created by an electrode pair (dipole). The working environment of the pair has nonzero conductivity and relative permittivity.

I first found the current density between the electrodes in the 3D electric module and I tried to take the current density value (ie Jx_emqvw) as the external surce of the induction (magnetic) module. Then I started the solver for both electric and magnetic module. However, total current density becomes nearly zero everytime because the induction currents(magnetic) module creates an induced current density equal to the external current density entered by me (ie Jx_emqvw).

What can I do to prevent COMSOL from creating an induced current density?

I would be very glad for your answers.

Regards,

Emin
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I did use the quasi static electromagnetic module before I tried this, and all the magnetic flux is created at the boundary. I thought that it is not much sense and I decided to try both modules seperately.

Also, I tried two boundaries which I take the smaller one as continuity and the larger one as magnetic insulation with infinite elements. So, the results was nearly the same, very small magnetix flux and at the boundaries.

And I forgot to mention, I thought the induced current that I found in the induction currents module was the reason for creating a very small (~1e-12 and 1e-14) magnetix flux by cancelling the external current density I have entered (ie Jx_emqvw).
 
What mathematics software should engineering students use? Is it correct that much of the engineering industry relies on MATLAB, making it the tool many graduates will encounter in professional settings? How does SageMath compare? It is a free package that supports both numerical and symbolic computation and can be installed on various platforms. Could it become more widely used because it is freely available? I am an academic who has taught engineering mathematics, and taught the...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K