Inductance of hollow conductor (copper pipe)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the inductance of a hollow copper pipe, focusing on the application of theoretical formulas and methods to derive inductance based on the pipe's dimensions and current flow. Participants explore different approaches to determine the inductance, including the effects of magnetic fields and current distribution.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Jason O initially seeks formulas for calculating the inductance of a hollow copper pipe, noting that existing formulas typically assume a solid conductor.
  • Jason presents an equation relating inductance to total flux and current, L = Φ/i, and attempts to derive the inductance using the magnetic flux density equation B = μ₀i/(4r).
  • Claude points out that Jason's derived equation yields inductance per unit length and suggests multiplying by the length to find the actual inductance, while also clarifying the dimensional consistency of the terms involved.
  • Jason acknowledges an error in his magnetic field equation and presents a revised equation for B, incorporating a new expression derived from an old Physics II exam for the magnetic field inside the hollow conductor.
  • Jason's final equation for inductance per unit length incorporates the length of the tube and rearranges terms for clarity, inviting feedback on its correctness.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of skin effect, explaining that at high frequencies, current tends to flow on the surface of conductors, suggesting that the hollow pipe behaves more like a transmission line than a simple inductor.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the hollow pipe's inductance, with some focusing on mathematical derivations and others emphasizing the physical behavior of current in conductors, particularly at high frequencies. No consensus is reached regarding the final form of the inductance equation or the implications of skin effect.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their equations, including assumptions about current distribution and the impact of frequency on inductance. The discussion reflects ongoing refinements and corrections to earlier claims without establishing definitive conclusions.

Jdo300
Messages
548
Reaction score
5
Hi Everyone,

I'm working on some inductance calculations and was wondering if anyone knows of any formulas (or methods) to determine the inductance of a straight piece of copper pipe, if the ID, wall thickness, and length are known? The closest thing I have found so far was the inductance of a straight conductor but the formula assumes it is solid.

Any help/pointers appreciated.

Thanks,
Jason O
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Update:

Doing some snooping around, I found an equation which relates the inductance to the total Flux and current:

L = \frac{\Phi}{i}

I also found an equation in my physics book, which gives the flux density at a point inside a cylindrical conductor, using this formula:

B = \frac{\mu_0 i}{4r}

Where:

r is the radius inside the tube where the B field is to be calculated
i is the current through the tube (assuming even current density distribution)

I reasoned that I could calculate the total flux through the cross section by integrating B over the radius of the tube from a to b, assuming a is the inside radius, and b is the outside radius. So I got to this point here:

\Phi = \frac {\mu_0 i}{4} \int ^{b}_{a}\frac{1}{r} dr = \frac {\mu_0 i}{4} [Ln(b) - Ln(a)]

Combining the above result with the first equation, I get:

L = \frac{\frac {\mu_0 i}{4} [Ln(b) - Ln(a)]}{i} = \frac {\mu_0}{4} [Ln(b) - Ln(a)]

However, I'm pretty sure there is something wrong with this equation as it doesn't take into account the length of the hollow copper tube. Can anyone see what I did wrong here?

Thanks,
Jason O
 
Jdo300 said:
Update:

Doing some snooping around, I found an equation which relates the inductance to the total Flux and current:

L = \frac{\Phi}{i}

I also found an equation in my physics book, which gives the flux density at a point inside a cylindrical conductor, using this formula:

B = \frac{\mu_0 i}{4r}

Where:

r is the radius inside the tube where the B field is to be calculated
i is the current through the tube (assuming even current density distribution)

I reasoned that I could calculate the total flux through the cross section by integrating B over the radius of the tube from a to b, assuming a is the inside radius, and b is the outside radius. So I got to this point here:

\Phi = \frac {\mu_0 i}{4} \int ^{b}_{a}\frac{1}{r} dr = \frac {\mu_0 i}{4} [Ln(b) - Ln(a)]

Combining the above result with the first equation, I get:

L = \frac{\frac {\mu_0 i}{4} [Ln(b) - Ln(a)]}{i} = \frac {\mu_0}{4} [Ln(b) - Ln(a)]

However, I'm pretty sure there is something wrong with this equation as it doesn't take into account the length of the hollow copper tube. Can anyone see what I did wrong here?

Thanks,
Jason O

Your equation yields "henry/meter" or inductance per unit length. Multiplying your answer by the length should give the actual inductance, assuming a mistake was not made in deriving it. The Ln(b) - ln(a) can be expressed as ln(b/a), which is dimensionless. The mu factor has units of henry/meter. So your answer is in henry/meter.

Claude
 
Hi Claude,

Thank you very much for the input. That does make sense now that I think about it.

I did notice there was a booboo in one of the equations so I needed to redo it again.

The equation for the magnetic field inside of a conductor is supposed to be

B = \frac{\mu_0 i}{2\pi r}

Also, after asking around more about this problem, I was given an old Physics II exam where there was an expression derived for the B field inside any point in the hollow conducting tube. It looks different that the equation I came up with but here it is:

B = \frac{\mu_0 i}{2\pi r}(\frac{r^2-a^2}{b^2-a^2})

Where:

r is the radius inside the tube where the B field is to be calculated
i is the current through the tube (assuming even current density distribution)
a = tube inner radius
b = tube outer radius

So, Integrating this from a to b to get the flux, I get:

\Phi = \frac{-(2a^2Ln(a)-a^2(2Ln(b)+1)+b^2)i\mu_0}{4\pi(a^2-b^2)}

Dividing out the current, i to get the inductance per unit length, I get:

L = \frac{-(2a^2Ln(a)-a^2(2Ln(b)+1)+b^2)\mu_0}{4\pi(a^2-b^2)}

Based on Claude's comment, I'll simple add a length term to specify the length of the tube. Also, rearranging terms to remove the minus sign and separate constants, I get this as my final equation:

L = \frac{\mu_0l}{4\pi}\frac{2a^2Ln(a)-a^2(2Ln(b)+1)+b^2}{b^2-a^2}

So that is my final answer. If anyone sees any mistakes here, please let me know.

Thanks!
Jason O
 
Last edited:
Jdo300 said:
Hi Everyone,

I'm working on some inductance calculations and was wondering if anyone knows of any formulas (or methods) to determine the inductance of a straight piece of copper pipe, if the ID, wall thickness, and length are known? The closest thing I have found so far was the inductance of a straight conductor but the formula assumes it is solid.

Any help/pointers appreciated.

Thanks,
Jason O

Hi Jason

You need to read up on "Skin effect"
Try Google for starters.
A pulse, or any high-frequency signal, tends to send current on the outer SURFACE of a conductor. Whether the "energy flow" is "inside" or "outside and guided by" the conductor is a question philosophers labour over!
The upshot is the "inductance" (Henrys) is a function of how QUICK is the rate-of change!

The current is in the form of TRAVELLING WAVES surging back and forth along the conductor and (at hig hfrequency ) may reverse in DIRECTION with radius.

You are right to use a hollow pipe as all the current (nearly all of it!) is on the
SURFACE (good for lightning conductors too because of the ultra-fast pulses)


Your pipe is not an inductor - it is a TRANSMISSION LINE with its own impedance, group and phase velocities.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K