TheRedDevil18 said:
If I use VL = 32V and IL = 8.4A and Wa = 620W
620 = 32*8.4*cos(30+∅)
cos(30+∅) = 2.31
But that can't be true
Good one ! I missed that, admittedly i didn't try out your numbers...
So we have an impossible result , a wattmeter reporting power factor over unity (the free energy crowd will love that !)
Therefore we must question our observations and root out what mistake(s) led us into that impossible conclusion ?
P1 reported 620 watts with 32 volts and 8.4 amps - something looks fishy there.
I note you show a CT but no PT(voltage stepdown transformer)
Look at the back of PI . Does it assume any PT ratio and CT ratios?
or Is full scale on P1 equal to 5A X 400V = 2000 Watts ?
If the latter, P1 will under-report power by the CT ratio
With CT set on 10::5 , 1240 watts would report as 620
with CT set on 20::5 , it'd take 2480 to report as 620
Sorry to be so uncertain - please realize i wasn't there and haven't seen your instruments. I'm accustomed to analog antiques in oak boxes..
In school labs it's not unusual for CT's to get blown... they're easily hurt by passing primary current with secondary open circuited.. That pierces insulation on secondary winding and they thereafter report way low. i hope that's not your trouble.
First i'd see if you get more reasonable results from multiplying wattmeter readings by whatever was your CT ratio , 2 or 4.
old jim