Induction Proof: Sum of Series $ \frac{1}{(2n-1)(2n+1)} = \frac{1}{2}$

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ognik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Series
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving by induction that the infinite series \( \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{(2n-1)(2n+1)} \) converges to \( \frac{1}{2} \). Participants explore various methods, including induction and partial fractions, while addressing the challenges of deriving the partial sum formula.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests starting with the base case \( n=1 \) and calculates \( S_1 = \frac{1}{3} \), expressing uncertainty about the next steps.
  • Another participant proposes using the partial sum formula \( \sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{(2k+1)(2k-1)} = \frac{n}{2n+1} \) and suggests proving this by induction before taking the limit as \( n \to \infty \).
  • Several participants express difficulty recalling how to derive the partial sum formula, with one noting the terms of the series as \( \frac{1}{3}, \frac{1}{15}, \frac{1}{35}, \frac{1}{63}, \ldots \).
  • There is a repeated inquiry about how the formula \( \frac{n}{2n+1} \) was obtained, with one participant confirming it was based on empirical observation of the first few sums.
  • Participants note a discrepancy between the expected result of \( \frac{1}{2} \) and the calculated partial sum of \( \frac{1}{3} \) for \( n=1 \), raising questions about the validity of the claim.
  • One participant shares a method for finding partial sums for non-geometric and non-arithmetic series, suggesting a structured approach to identify patterns in the sums.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the derivation of the partial sum formula and the convergence of the series. There is no consensus on the correctness of the initial claim that the series converges to \( \frac{1}{2} \), as some calculations suggest otherwise.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of a clear derivation for the partial sum formula and the unresolved nature of the series' convergence based on initial calculations.

ognik
Messages
626
Reaction score
2
Q. Show by induction that $ \sum_{1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{(2n-1)(2n+1)} = \frac{1}{2} $

So, start with base case n=1, $ S_1 = \frac{1}{(2-1)(2+1)} = \frac{1}{3}$? Maybe it's bedtime ...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think (if forced to use induction rather than partial fractions and telescoping series) what I would do is begin with the partial sum formula:

$$\sum_{k=1}^n\frac{1}{(2k+1)(2k-1)}=\frac{n}{2n+1}$$

Now prove that by induction, and then take the limit as $n\to\infty$ to get the desired result. :)
 
Sorry, suspect I know how to get the partial sum but can't bring it to mind, the terms would be $ \frac{1}{3}, \frac{1}{15},\frac{1}{35}, \frac{1}{63},... $ I can see your sum is right, but not how to get it ...
 
ognik said:
Sorry, suspect I know how to get the partial sum but can't bring it to mind, the terms would be $ \frac{1}{3}, \frac{1}{15},\frac{1}{35}, \frac{1}{63},... $ I can see your sum is right, but not how to get it ...

Okay, given that you have verified the base case, then we state $P_n$:

$$\sum_{k=1}^n\frac{1}{(2k+1)(2k-1)}=\frac{n}{2n+1}$$

Now, for our induction step, I would look at the difference:

$$\frac{n+1}{2(n+1)+1}-\frac{n}{2n+1}=\frac{1}{(2(n+1)+1)(2(n+1)-1)}$$

Can you proceed?
 
Hi - what I'm missing is how you got to $ \frac{n}{2n+1} $ - as far as I can see its neither arithmetic nor geometric series, and I couldn't see how to get $ \frac{n}{2n+1} $ by inspection either? Once I have that 1st step, I know the rest :-)
 
ognik said:
Hi - what I'm missing is how you got to $ \frac{n}{2n+1} $ - as far as I can see its neither arithmetic nor geometric series, and I couldn't see how to get $ \frac{n}{2n+1} $ by inspection either? Once I have that 1st step, I know the rest :-)

It was a hypothesis (which I confirmed before posting it) based on the first several sums. :)
 
Suppose that comes with experience... Next question is that the book said $ = \frac{1}{2}$ but the partial sum (and testing the 1st partial sum in the original formula) seems to get $$\frac{1}{3}$$?
 
ognik said:
Suppose that comes with experience... Next question is that the book said $ = \frac{1}{2}$ but the partial sum (and testing the 1st partial sum in the original formula) seems to get $$\frac{1}{3}$$?

Once you have proved:

$$S_n=\sum_{k=1}^n\frac{1}{(2k+1)(2k-1)}=\frac{n}{2n+1}$$

Then, use:

$$S_{\infty}=\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(\frac{n}{2n+1}\right)$$

What do you get?
 
Hi - it all looked crystal clear in the morning :-) Thanks for your patience
 
  • #10
For the benefit of anyone who has the predicament of trying to find a partial sum formula for other than geometric & arithmetic series, without using partial fractions, I figured out the following approach.

Start with a row of the first few n values.
Under each n, calculate the corresponding term of the series
Under each n again, find the nth sum by adding the terms from the previous row. A pattern should appear for which you can find a partial sum formula.

Using this post's problem ( $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{(2n-1)(2n+1)}$) as an example, and a matrix structure just for convenience, the above approach gives:

$ \begin{bmatrix}n:&1&2&3&4\\ \frac{1}{(2n-1)(2n+1)}:&\frac{1}{3}&\frac{1}{15}&\frac{1}{35}&\frac{1}{63}\\S_n:&\frac{1}{3}&\frac{2}{5}&\frac{3}{7}&\frac{4}{9}\end{bmatrix}$

The pattern for the partial sums is now clear and can be written as $ \frac{n}{2n+1}$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K