Induction Proofs Homework: Prove ∑nj=0 n C r = 2n

  • Thread starter Thread starter Keen94
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Proofs
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the identity ∑j=0n Cr = 2n using mathematical induction. The problem involves combinations and the binomial theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the validity of the inductive step and the base case for n=1. There are questions about the starting point of the summation and the definitions used. Some participants express curiosity about the discovery of the formula and its relation to the binomial theorem.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the proof structure, with some participants offering suggestions for clarity. Multiple interpretations of the problem and its implications are being considered, but no consensus has been reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of defining combinations properly, especially when considering edge cases like j=-1. There is also mention of historical context regarding the discovery of the binomial theorem.

Keen94
Messages
41
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Prove that ∑nj=0 n C r = 2n

Homework Equations


Defn. of a combination.
Defn. of mathematical induction.

The Attempt at a Solution


The formula is true for n=1
2=∑j=01 n C r
= 1 C 0 +1 C 1
=1 + 1
= 2
Now assume that for some k∈ℕ and 0≤ j ≤ k we have
2k = ∑kj=0 (k C j)
Then
(2)(2k)=2k+1= (2)kj=0 (k C j)

LHS= ∑kj=0 (k C j) + ∑kj=0 (k C j)

LHS= ∑kj=0 (k C j) + ∑k+1j=0 (k C j-1)

LHS= ∑kj=0 (k C j) + ∑kj=0 (k C j-1) + (k+1 C k+1)

LHS= ∑kj=0 [ (k C j) + (k Cj-1) ] +(k+1 C k+1)

LHS= ∑kj=0 (k+1 C j) + (k+1 C k+1)

LHS= ∑k+1j=0 (k+1 C j)

Does everything check? In addition, how was this formula discovered? How do people even find these things? Thanks again for the help guys and gals.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Seems OK, although it would be cleaner to adjust the ## j=0 ## starting point in some of your sums - these work if you define ## _k C _j= 0## for ## j=-1 ## but if you are using that you should say so.

Otherwise I don't know how it was discovered but one way to see it directly is to note that ## _n C _k ## is the number of subsets of ## k ## elements of a set having ## n ## elements, and ## 2^n ## is the number of all subsets of a set having ## n ## elements.
 
Last edited:
wabbit said:
Seems OK, although it would be cleaner to adjust the ## j=0 ## starting point in some of your sums - these work if you define ## k C j= 0## for ## j=-1 ## but if you are using that you should say so.

Otherwise I don't know how it was discovered but one way to see it directly is to note that ## n C k ## is the number of subsets of ## k ## elements of a set having ## n ## elements, and ## 2^n ## is the number of all subsets of a set having ## n ## elements.
thanks for the reply. I forgot that nCr is the number of subsets of k elements of a set of n elements. I've seen other proofs for that.
 
Keen94 said:

Homework Statement


Prove that ∑nj=0 n C r = 2n

Homework Equations


Defn. of a combination.
Defn. of mathematical induction.

The Attempt at a Solution


The formula is true for n=1
2=∑j=01 n C r
= 1 C 0 +1 C 1
=1 + 1
= 2
Now assume that for some k∈ℕ and 0≤ j ≤ k we have
2k = ∑kj=0 (k C j)
Then
(2)(2k)=2k+1= (2)kj=0 (k C j)

LHS= ∑kj=0 (k C j) + ∑kj=0 (k C j)

LHS= ∑kj=0 (k C j) + ∑k+1j=0 (k C j-1)

LHS= ∑kj=0 (k C j) + ∑kj=0 (k C j-1) + (k+1 C k+1)

LHS= ∑kj=0 [ (k C j) + (k Cj-1) ] +(k+1 C k+1)

LHS= ∑kj=0 (k+1 C j) + (k+1 C k+1)

LHS= ∑k+1j=0 (k+1 C j)

Does everything check? In addition, how was this formula discovered? How do people even find these things? Thanks again for the help guys and gals.

People discover these thing by first discovering the binomial theorem
(1+x)^n = \sum_{k=0}^m {}_nC_k \, x^k
and then putting ##x = 1##.

Newton discovered that result in 1665, before age 25.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K