Inductive Loop Detectors at Hight Vehicle Speed

AI Thread Summary
Inductive loop detectors (ILD) are used to identify vehicle presence by monitoring changes in the magnetic field caused by ferrous objects. The discussion highlights concerns about the reliability of ILD data, especially for fast-moving vehicles, as traditional methods may struggle to detect vehicles traveling at high speeds, such as 100 km/hr. Higher excitation frequencies can improve detection for fast vehicles, allowing for quicker impedance changes to be registered. Newer technologies, like B-field sensors, can also effectively detect fast-moving vehicles by measuring alterations in the Earth's magnetic field. The reliability issues may stem from the detectors failing to register vehicles or incorrectly indicating their presence.
Neyolight
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hello Everyone

I am currently studying the inductive loop detectors used in the traffic control department. I believe the data from the detectors is highly unreliable and noisy. A lot of research has been going on on the 'Fault detecting algorithm' and other means to improve the accuracy of an ILD(Inductive Loop Detector).

My question is, How do these ILD detect a fast moving vehicle. Let's say a vehicle going at 100 km/hr on a motorway. It would go over a normal (4m x 4m or even smaller) inductive loop within FRACTION of seconds.

IDL works in the following way : ILD have a magnetic field around them---> incoming vehicle disturbers the magnetic field --> the ILD induces eddy currents into the conductor part of the vehicle --> thereby reducing its own inductance -->if this decrease in inductance crosses a threshold value, a call is made to the electronic unit and the vehicle presence is identified.

This is quite a LONG process. I fail to understand how all this can be done within FRACTION of seconds. Surely the conductor(vehicle) needs to be in the magnetic field (over loop) for 'some' time to be able to disturb the magnetic field PROPERLY.

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASEEEEEEEE Can someone give me some tips on how ILD works in high speed environment ! Thanks !

Neyoligh
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Neyolight said:
Hello Everyone

I am currently studying the inductive loop detectors used in the traffic control department. I believe the data from the detectors is highly unreliable and noisy. A lot of research has been going on on the 'Fault detecting algorithm' and other means to improve the accuracy of an ILD(Inductive Loop Detector).

My question is, How do these ILD detect a fast moving vehicle. Let's say a vehicle going at 100 km/hr on a motorway. It would go over a normal (4m x 4m or even smaller) inductive loop within FRACTION of seconds.

IDL works in the following way : ILD have a magnetic field around them---> incoming vehicle disturbers the magnetic field --> the ILD induces eddy currents into the conductor part of the vehicle --> thereby reducing its own inductance -->if this decrease in inductance crosses a threshold value, a call is made to the electronic unit and the vehicle presence is identified.

This is quite a LONG process. I fail to understand how all this can be done within FRACTION of seconds. Surely the conductor(vehicle) needs to be in the magnetic field (over loop) for 'some' time to be able to disturb the magnetic field PROPERLY.

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASEEEEEEEE Can someone give me some tips on how ILD works in high speed environment ! Thanks !

Neyoligh

Welcome to the PF.

There are two techniques that are used that I am aware of for the detectors. The traditional way is to drive an AC waveform into the loop, and monitor the impedance of the loop. As a ferrous metal object moves over the loop, that alters the impedance, which the circuit detects as a vehicle.

For slow-moving vehicles or stopped vehicles (like the detectors at intersections), you could just use AC Mains frequency probably (50/60Hz). But as you say, for fast-moving vehicles on expressways, you would need to use a higher excitation frequency to be sure to get a few cycles of impedance change that your circuit could detect.

There is a newer detector technology that I learned about here on the PF. The sensors are just B-field sensors, and they detect the magnitude and direction of the Earth's magnetic field. That gets altered when a ferrous metal object is over them, which the circuit interprets as a vehicle. As long as the sensor and monitoring circuit have reasonable bandwidth, they can be used for fast-moving vehicles.
 
Unreliable in what sense? Do they say there is a car present when in fact there is none, or maybe they fail to register cars, perhaps both?

100km/hr = 27.8m/s. If I assume a car is more than 1m long then it will spend more than 36ms over the sensor. That could definitely be enough time to take a good measurement (that's more than the time of two 60Hz cycles) especially if you just want one bit (car present or not).

If two of these sensors were a known distance apart just one bit from each would be enough to make a speed measurement.
 
Thanks berkeman and es1

The issue I have with the loop is that it just does not detect fast moving vehicle. I don't know why is that. I would be doing some experiments with a real inductive loop myself shortly and hopefully will figure out the reason behind it. :)
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top