Inductive Power Transfer across a metal

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using inductive power transfer through a metal barrier, specifically focusing on the use of copper coils on either side of a non-magnetic alloy. Participants explore various configurations and the implications of power transfer efficiency, losses, and the physical constraints of the setup.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether inductive power transfer can work through a non-magnetic metal barrier, suggesting that losses and eddy currents may prevent effective transfer.
  • Another participant proposes that if the coils are complete current loops, inductive transfer might be possible, but challenges remain at 60 Hz frequency due to the high power involved.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes the need for a laminated magnetic core to improve efficiency, while expressing uncertainty about the effects of aluminum layers.
  • Concerns are raised about the efficiency of transferring 1.2 MW of power through the barrier, with one participant estimating significant heat losses that could arise from the setup.
  • One participant argues that conductive metal walls severely limit power transfer due to skin effect and eddy currents, suggesting that AC current would create significant heating and inefficiencies.
  • Another participant highlights the importance of ensuring that all circuit wires pass through the same hole in the wall to maintain current balance and reduce eddy currents.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the feasibility and efficiency of inductive power transfer through a metal barrier. While some suggest it is possible but inefficient, others argue that the physical properties of conductive materials may render the approach impractical. No consensus is reached on the viability of the proposed setups.

Contextual Notes

Participants note various limitations, including the dependence on the thickness of the barrier, the nature of the materials involved, and the specific power levels being considered. The discussion reflects uncertainty regarding the practical implementation of inductive transfer in this context.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to engineers and researchers exploring inductive power transfer technologies, particularly in applications involving barriers or enclosures, as well as those concerned with high-power electrical systems.

J_B
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi folks,

This is probably a fairly basic question with a fairly easy answer. I was wondering if you could use the concept of inductive power transfer using a copper coil on each side of a metal barrier? If that metal barrier was a non-magnetic alloy.

I have attached 2 drawings showing 3 different coil set-ups. Would any of them work? If not then is there a set-up that would allow this? The wall of the pressure barrier could be fairly thin but has to be made out of a metal.

My system is as follows: 3 phase AC driving a load connected at a star point. 140A, 5KV AC.

I'm thinking the answer will be a resounding "no" due to losses/eddy currents in the barrier material.

Thanks for your time.

JB
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Even if the set-up could be the same as a transformer but the core forms part of the metal barrier? Does a transformer core need to be insulated from anything metallic around it?
 
The way you have this drawn seems to indicate the coil is a "dead end" like a monopole antenna - this this case this will not work, because you are tying to use RF to transmit though a conductor.
If the Coil are complete current loops - then this can work but at 60 Hz would be tough. In this case you are using magnetic inductance and this can pass through the shield (non-magnetic) as shown. As for eddy currents - the thinner the shield the better, and or laminate sandwich with multiple layers of conductor and insulator - but I feel the load is too high - you are talking about a MW - look how big a MW transformer is.
Your second post is also a little confusing - you can get MEI shielded transformers, with an shield between the HV and LV side, but then you mention the core insulated from anything...large transformers have laminated steel cores, and are grounded, typically in one corner, so no loops are created in the core.
 
Let's assume the coils are complete current paths, and this operates at 60 Hz.

I think you need a laminated magnetic core of some type inside the inner coil. I think that helps but I'm not a magnetics guy. The layer of aluminum should have minimal effect. I could be totally wrong.
 
Hi again,

I haven't been able to get this one out of my head - the reason for doing this is to transfer power into a pressure vessel without using a bulkhead/fittings to gain access into the vessel. For complete reliability/integrity.

I have attached a drawing that shows two 3-phase circuits connected at star points either side of a wall. If the coils on each leg of the star point were lined up and were close enough to each other (ie the vessel wall is thin enough), could you drive the load at the end of the second 3-phase circuit in this way? Would there be too many losses in the metallic vessel wall?

Thanks for your help.

Jonny
 

Attachments

OK -- I think I see a little more of what you are looking for - however are you looking for galvanic isolation protection, or are you just trying to solve the pressure vessel issue ... how much pressure??.

Next we need to know about power - your diagram looks like 3 phase? 140A 5KV...umm that's like 1.2MW... if you are really looking to use that much power I would run leads thought the wall and deal with the other issues.

I believe trying to do what you want will be too inefficient for high power ... for example assume good transformer performance 2% - x 1.2 MW = 24KW of heat!

So based on what I see - yes it can be done, but it is probably not the best way to go. Try This: http://www.energy.siemens.com/br/po...ea/products/connectors/SpecTRON_July_2013.pdf
 
Ok, thanks a lot for this. Very helpful. So its possible, but not efficient. How would the losses manifest itself? As heat in the wall of the vessel?
 
Yes - and based on my power estimate...<< 24KW is too much for the custom transformer - wall system to handle. Electrically possible, mechanically a disaster.
 
It does not matter if the conductive metal is magnetic or not. Very little power can be transferred through a conductive metal wall as an AC current, voltage or magnetic field, due to skin effect. The magnetic field will cause an eddy current that creates an opposite magnetic field to cancel most of the applied field, good conductors make very good magnetic shields. Eddy currents induced in the conductive wall will significantly heat the pressure vessel material.

DC is not possible, it would see a short circuit, DC current will also cause galvanic problems.

Where an AC cable passes through a conductive wall, all circuit wires must pass through the same hole so the net current is sum zero. Often in steel, a radial cut is made away from the hole so as to reduce the circumferential magnetic field and associated circulating eddy currents that could exist in the wall due to current imbalance. (An example, a DC starter motor cable passing through a steel wall needs a return path cable through the same hole).

None of this makes it easier with pressure vessels constructed from conductive material. It probably makes it impossible.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K