MHB Inequality Challenge: Prove 1/44 > 1/1999

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the inequality $$\frac{1}{44}>\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\left(\frac{3}{4}\right)\left(\frac{5}{6}\right)\cdots\left( \frac{1997}{1998}\right)>\frac{1}{1999}$$ using mathematical induction and manipulation of products. The product $$\frac{1}{2}\frac{3}{4}\cdots\frac{1997}{1998}$$ is denoted as x, leading to the conclusion that $$x^2<\frac{1}{1999}$$ implies $$x<\frac{1}{44}$$. An inductive proof is provided to show that $$P_n > \frac{1}{2n+1}$$ holds for all n, confirming the second part of the inequality. The thread effectively demonstrates the relationships between the fractions and establishes the required inequalities.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Show that $$\frac{1}{44}>\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\left(\frac{3}{4}\right)\left(\frac{5}{6}\right)\cdots\left( \frac{1997}{1998}\right)>\frac{1}{1999}$$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For the first one,
$$\left(\frac{1+1}{2+1}\right)\cdots\Big(\frac{1997+1}{1998+1}\Big)>\Big(\frac{1}{2}\Big)\Big(\frac{3}{4}\Big)\Big(\frac{5}{6}\Big)\cdots\Big(\frac{1997}{1998}\Big)
$$
$$\Big(\frac{2}{3}\Big)\Big(\frac{4}{5}\Big)\cdots \Big(\frac{1998}{1999}\Big)>\Big(\frac{1}{2}\Big).\Big(\frac{3}{4}\Big)\Big(\frac{5}{6}\Big)\cdots\Big(\frac{1997}{1998}\Big)$$
$\text{let,}$
$$\frac{1}{2}\frac{3}{4}\frac{5}{6}\cdots\frac{1997}{1998}=x$$
$$\frac{1}{x\cdot1999}>x$$
$$x^2<\frac{1}{1999}$$
$$x<\frac{1}{44+x}$$
$\text{hence,}$
$$x<\frac{1}{44}$$
 
Last edited:
anemone said:
Show that $$\frac{1}{44}>\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\left(\frac{3}{4}\right)\left(\frac{5}{6}\right)\cdots\left( \frac{1997}{1998}\right)>\frac{1}{1999}$$
The other inequality is easily proved by induction. Let $P_n = \Bigl(\dfrac{1}{2}\Bigr)\Bigl(\dfrac{3}{4}\Bigr) \cdots \Bigl(\dfrac{2n-1}{2n}\Bigr).$ Then $P_n > \dfrac{1}{2n+1}$.

Proof. The base case $n=1$ certainly holds. Assuming the inductive hypothesis, $$P_{n+1} = P_n\Bigl(\dfrac{2n+1}{2n+2}\Bigr) > \dfrac{1}{2n+1}\Bigl(\dfrac{2n+1}{2n+2}\Bigr) = \dfrac{1}{2n+2} > \dfrac{1}{2n+3},$$ which completes the inductive step.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top