Inequality involving Zeta Function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on proving the inequality $$\frac{\zeta(r)}{\zeta(2r)} < \left(1 + \frac{1}{2^r}\right) \frac{(1 + 3^r)^2}{1 + 3^{2r}}$$ for $r > 2$. Participants explore the relationship between the Riemann Zeta function and its Euler product representation, specifically using the Dirichlet series and properties of the Möbius function. The discussion highlights the need for a rigorous proof, with various mathematical identities and logarithmic transformations being proposed to establish the inequality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Riemann Zeta function and its properties
  • Familiarity with Dirichlet series and the Euler product formula
  • Knowledge of the Möbius function and its applications in number theory
  • Basic proficiency in logarithmic identities and Taylor series expansions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Riemann Zeta function, particularly $\zeta(s)$ for complex arguments
  • Learn about the Euler product representation of the Zeta function
  • Investigate the Möbius function and its role in analytic number theory
  • Explore advanced logarithmic identities and their applications in inequalities
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, number theorists, and students interested in analytic number theory, particularly those focusing on the properties of the Riemann Zeta function and related inequalities.

Bibubo
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Prove that for $r>2$ we have $$\frac{\zeta\left(r\right)}{\zeta\left(2r\right)}<\left(1+\frac{1}{2^{r}}\right)\frac{\left(1+3^{r}\right)^{2}}{1+3^{2r}}.$$ I've tried to write Zeta as Euler product but I haven't solve it.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Bibubo said:
Prove that for $r>2$ we have $$\frac{\zeta\left(r\right)}{\zeta\left(2r\right)}<\left(1+\frac{1}{2^{r}}\right)\frac{\left(1+3^{r}\right)^{2}}{1+3^{2r}}.$$ I've tried to write Zeta as Euler product but I haven't solve it.

There is an explicit expression of the function in term of Dirichlet series...

$\displaystyle \frac{\zeta (r)}{\zeta (2\ r)} = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{\mu^{2} (n)} {n^{r}}\ (1)$

... where $\mu(n)$ is the Moebious function. May be that the (1) is the right way but it requires some work...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Ideally, a proof would probably involve the Euler product instead of the Dirichlet series

$$\frac{\zeta(s)}{\zeta(2s)} = \prod_p \left ( 1 + \frac1{p^s} \right )$$
 
mathbalarka said:
Ideally, a proof would probably involve the Euler product instead of the Dirichlet series

$$\frac{\zeta(s)}{\zeta(2s)} = \prod_p \left ( 1 + \frac1{p^s} \right )$$

I've tried the Euler product way, but I haven't found a solution.
 
I've been working on this problem, but no solution. Where did it come from? I observed that, since $\zeta(2)= \frac{\pi^2}{6}$ and $\zeta(4)=\frac{\pi^4}{90}$, we have

$$\frac{\zeta(2)}{\zeta(4)}=\frac{15}{\pi^2}\approx 1.51981$$

and

$(1+\frac{1}{4})\frac{(1+9)^2}{1+81}\approx 1.52439$

so the inequality also holds for $r=2$.
 
Writing the function as Euler product...

$\displaystyle \varphi(r)= \frac{\zeta(r)}{\zeta(2\ r)} = \prod_{p} (1 + \frac{1}{p^{r}}) = (1 + \frac{1}{2^{r}})\ (1 + \frac{1}{3^{r}})\ ... (1)$

... and taking the logarithm we obtain...

$\displaystyle \ln \frac{\varphi(r)}{1 + \frac{1}{2^{r}}} = \ln (1 + \frac{1}{3^{r}}) + ...\ (2)$

But is...

$\displaystyle \ln (1 + \frac{1}{3^{r}}) = \frac{1}{3^{r}} - \frac{1}{2\ 3^{2\ r}} + \frac{1}{3\ 3^{3\ r}} + ...\ (3)$

... and ...

$\displaystyle \ln \frac{(1 + \frac{1}{3^{r}})^{2}}{1 + \frac{1}{3^{2\ r}}} = \frac{2}{3^{r}} - \frac{1}{3^{2\ r}} + \frac{2}{3\ 3^{3\ r}} - ... - \frac{1}{3^{2\ r}} + \frac{1}{2\ 3^{4\ r}} - ... = \frac{2}{3^{r}} - \frac{2}{3^{2\ r}} + \frac{2}{3\ 3^{3\ r}} + ...\ (4)$

... so that comparing (3) and (4) we obtain that...

$\displaystyle \ln \frac{\varphi(r)}{1 + \frac{1}{2^{r}}} < \ln \frac{(1 + \frac{1}{3^{r}})^{2}}{1 + \frac{1}{3^{2\ r}}}\ (5)$

... what we intend to demonstrate...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Last edited:
chisigma said:
Writing the function as Euler product...

$\displaystyle \varphi(r)= \frac{\zeta(r)}{\zeta(2\ r)} = \prod_{p} (1 + \frac{1}{p^{r}}) = (1 + \frac{1}{2^{r}})\ (1 + \frac{1}{3^{r}})\ ... (1)$

... and taking the logarithm we obtain...

$\displaystyle \ln \frac{\varphi(r)}{1 + \frac{1}{2^{r}}} = \ln (1 + \frac{1}{3^{r}}) + ...\ (2)$

But is...

$\displaystyle \ln (1 + \frac{1}{3^{r}}) = \frac{1}{3^{r}} - \frac{1}{2\ 3^{2\ r}} + \frac{1}{3\ 3^{3\ r}} + ...\ (3)$

... and ...

$\displaystyle \ln \frac{(1 + \frac{1}{3^{r}})^{2}}{1 + \frac{1}{3^{2\ r}}} = \frac{2}{3^{r}} - \frac{1}{3^{2\ r}} + \frac{2}{3\ 3^{3\ r}} - ... - \frac{1}{3^{2\ r}} + \frac{1}{2\ 3^{4\ r}} - ... = \frac{2}{3^{r}} - \frac{2}{3^{2\ r}} + \frac{2}{3\ 3^{3\ r}} + ...\ (4)$

... so that comparing (3) and (4) we obtain that...

$\displaystyle \ln \frac{\varphi(r)}{1 + \frac{1}{2^{r}}} < \ln \frac{(1 + \frac{1}{3^{r}})^{2}}{1 + \frac{1}{3^{2\ r}}}\ (5)$

... what we intend to demonstrate...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$

Sorry but I don't see the point. You have something like $$\log\left(\frac{\left(1+3^{r}\right)^{2}}{1+3^{2r}}\right)=2\left(\underset{n\, odd}{\sum}\frac{1}{n}\,\frac{1}{3^{rn}}-2\underset{n\, even,\,4\nmid n}{\sum}\frac{1}{n}\,\frac{1}{3^{2rn}}\right)$$ because if $4\mid n$ we have a cancellation. Why is this bigger than $$\underset{p\geq3}{\sum}\log\left(1+\frac{1}{p^{r}}\right)?$$
 
Bibubo said:
Sorry but I don't see the point. You have something like $$\log\left(\frac{\left(1+3^{r}\right)^{2}}{1+3^{2r}}\right)=2\left(\underset{n\, odd}{\sum}\frac{1}{n}\,\frac{1}{3^{rn}}-2\underset{n\, even,\,4\nmid n}{\sum}\frac{1}{n}\,\frac{1}{3^{2rn}}\right)$$ because if $4\mid n$ we have a cancellation. Why is this bigger than $$\underset{p\geq3}{\sum}\log\left(1+\frac{1}{p^{r}}\right)?$$

I apologize for having understood the identity $\displaystyle \frac{(1 + 3^{r})^{2}}{1 + 3^{2\ r}}= \frac{(1 + \frac{1}{3^{r}})^{2}}{1 + \frac{1}{3^{2\ r}}}$, that permits to me to use the Taylor expansion $\displaystyle \ln (1 + \varepsilon) = \varepsilon - \frac{\varepsilon^{2}}{2} + \frac{\varepsilon^{3}}{3} - ...$...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
chisigma said:
I apologize for having understood the identity $\displaystyle \frac{(1 + 3^{r})^{2}}{1 + 3^{2\ r}}= \frac{(1 + \frac{1}{3^{r}})^{2}}{1 + \frac{1}{3^{2\ r}}}$, that permits to me to use the Taylor expansion $\displaystyle \ln (1 + \varepsilon) = \varepsilon - \frac{\varepsilon^{2}}{2} + \frac{\varepsilon^{3}}{3} - ...$...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$

You can write as you told. In fact you have $$\frac{\left(1+3^{r}\right)}{1+3^{2r}}^{2}=\frac{\left(3^{r}\left(1+\frac{1}{3^{r}}\right)\right)^{2}}{3^{2r}\left(1+\frac{1}{3^{2r}}\right)}=\frac{\left(1+\frac{1}{3^{r}}\right)^{2}}{1+\frac{1}{3^{2r}}}$$ but I haven't understood how your proof can show my inequality.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K