Inequality Problem from Spivak's Calculus: Chapter 1, Problem 4, Subproblem XI

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding all numbers x that satisfy the inequality 2x < 8, which is situated within the context of introductory calculus as presented in Spivak's text.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the interpretation of the inequality, with some suggesting it may pertain to integer values. Others explore the implications of the monotonic nature of the exponential function and logarithmic transformations.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the inequality, with some participants providing insights into the properties of exponential functions and logarithms. Acknowledgment of the relationship between the base and exponent is noted, but no consensus has been reached on the complete solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the mathematical context and the specific requirements of the problem as outlined by Spivak, indicating a need for clarity in the proof process.

Why?
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find all numbers x for which:

2x<8

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I really haven't been able to figure this one out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have any calculations to show?

I assume it means integer values? If so surely isn't it just:

[tex]x=-\infty, ..., 0, \pm 1, \pm 2, \pm 3[/tex]

Unless I'm missing the point somewhere? It seems a bit simple though.

:smile:
 
Note that [tex]8=2^{3}[/tex], 2^{x} in monotonically increasing. So the question is, what values of x satisfy
[tex] 2^{x}<2^{3}[/tex]
can you say what values satisfy this equation?
 
Stated in a different way, [itex]\log_2(t)[/itex] is an increasing function. Inequalities remain true if you apply an increasing function.
 
Sorry I wasn't very clear.

Just thinking it through I know that 23 is 8, so x<3.

However my difficulty was in proving it, using the mathematical context that Spivak uses.

hunt_mat's example makes a lot of sense to me and fulfills that need to explain it more concretely.

Thanks for your help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K