Inequality question -- Need help getting started...

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 731016
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the equivalence of inequalities involving absolute values, specifically the expression ##0 < |x - a| < \delta##. Participants are exploring the foundational properties of inequalities and absolute values in a mathematical context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the initial steps when dealing with absolute values, suggesting the consideration of cases based on the sign of the expression. There is mention of sketching a number line to visualize the problem. Questions arise regarding the properties of inequalities and the implications of multiplying by positive or negative numbers.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the problem, emphasizing the importance of showing work and understanding the properties of inequalities. There is an acknowledgment of gaps in mathematical background, which may affect comprehension. The discussion is ongoing, with participants reflecting on their understanding.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenges posed by their mathematical background and the cumulative nature of learning in mathematics, suggesting that earlier material may need to be reviewed for better understanding.

member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this,
1679620253187.png

I am confused how to show that they are equivalent. Can some please give me some guidance?

Many thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What is always the first step when absolute values are involved? Two cases for |x-a|, depending on the sign of x-a.
Where can you go from there?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR and member 731016
FactChecker said:
What is always the first step when absolute values are involved? Two cases for |x-a|, depending on the sign of x-a.
Where can you go from there?
Thanks for your reply @FactChecker!

First case is

-(x - a)

Second case is

x - a
 
Right. Now you need to show some work using that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR and member 731016
FactChecker said:
Right. Now you need to show some work using that.
Thanks @FactChecker!

##0 < -(x - a) < \delta##
##0 < x - a <\delta##

Many thanks!
 
Callumnc1 said:
Thanks @FactChecker!

##0 < -(x - a) < \delta##
##0 < x - a <\delta##

Many thanks!
Nevermind, I understand now. It seems so strange that you can multiply all three sides of an equality by the same number. I don't know what this property is called thought.
 
Callumnc1 said:
I am confused how to show that they are equivalent. Can some please give me some guidance?
For the continued inequality ##0 < |x - a| < \delta##, it's helpful to draw a sketch or two of the number line with a in an arbitrary position. x will then have to be somewhere inside a band of width ##2\delta## around a, but excluding a itself.
Callumnc1 said:
Nevermind, I understand now. It seems so strange that you can multiply all three sides of an equality by the same number. I don't know what this property is called thought.
The statement you started with is not an equation -- it's an inequality. There is a property of equations that you can multiply both sides of an equation by any nonzero number to get a new, equivalent equation. This idea can be extended to a continued equation.

There is a similar property for inequalities, but with a twist. You can multiply both sides of an inequality by a positive number to get a new, equivalent inequality. This also can be extended to continued inequalities. The twist is that if you multiply both sides by a negative number, the direction of the inequality must change.

Yet again, the very large gaps in your mathematical background are causing you to spend a lot of time merely trying to understand what would be immediately obvious to someone who didn't have these gaps.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016, SammyS and FactChecker
Mark44 said:
Yet again, the very large gaps in your mathematical background are causing you to spend a lot of time merely trying to understand what would be immediately obvious to someone who didn't have these gaps.
Amen! Mathematics is very cumulative. Anything that you were taught earlier will be used over and over in what follows. It can be very beneficial to review earlier material until it becomes natural to you.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K