I Infinite Square Well with an Oscillating Wall (Klein-Gordon Equation)

Foracle
Messages
29
Reaction score
8
TL;DR Summary
Numerical solution of the wavefunction blows up when the frequency of oscillation of the wall is high. What does this mean?
I am trying to numerically solve (with Mathematica) a relativistic version of infinite square well with an oscillating wall using Klein-Gordon equation. Firstly, I transform my spatial coordinate ## x \to y = \frac{x}{L[t]} ## to make the wall look static (this transformation is used a lot in solving non-static boundary condition in the non-relativistic case), which brings Klein-Gordon equation to :
Input :
1644917229990.png

Output :
1644917258275.png

All constants have been set to 1
1644917266102.png

I tried to solve this system where ##L(t)=2+sin(1000 t)## using NDSolve :
1644917349008.png

Then I plot my result as a function of ##(y,t)## :
1644917373977.png

The wavefunction ##\psi## blows up. This doesn't happen when I tune the frequency down to 1, ##L(t)=2+sin(t)##
1644917399498.png

My question is why does ##\psi## blow up when the frequency of the oscillation is high and what does it mean? Does it have anything to do with particle production? Or did I just mess up my code?
 

Attachments

  • 1644917332177.png
    1644917332177.png
    7.1 KB · Views: 139
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I have located my error. It was the fact that when I set ##\omega## to 1000, the velocity of the wall, ##\dot{L} = \omega cos(\omega t) \ge 1##, which is not allowed in the units that I am working with ##(c=1)##.
The solution to this is just to set ##L(t) = \frac{1}{\omega} (2+sin(\omega t))##, and this disastrous result doesn't happen anymore.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top