Infinite sum over exponentials

  • Thread starter Thread starter ThomasVogt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinite Sum
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating the infinite sum of exponentials, specifically the expression ∑_{n=-∞}^{+∞} e^{-2π i n k}, which represents a Dirac comb relevant in sampling theory. Participants suggest splitting the sum into two parts and applying the geometric series formula, noting that this approach may yield unexpected results for certain values of the angular wavenumber k. The original poster acknowledges their oversight regarding the Dirac comb and expresses frustration over not recognizing the divergence of the sum when k is an integer. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the conditions under which the geometric series can be applied. Overall, the thread emphasizes the complexity of handling infinite sums in wave analysis.
ThomasVogt
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am looking at waves that go around a ring (monochromatic solution) and got stuck with the following expression:

\sum_{n=-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{-2\pi i n k}

where k is an angular wavenumber that can take any real value. Anyone got an idea how to approach this?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
One way to see the result uart posted is as follows:

Split the sum up into two sums, one from -infinity to -1 and one from 0 to infinity, and then change variables in the first sum from n to -n. Both series are just geometric series, so you can perform the two sums using the geometric series formula and add the results together. The result you find might be unexpected to you. However, you're not done there - there is are particular values of k for which you can't use the geometric series formula. What happens to the sum at those values of k?
 
Uart - of course, how could I not see it! Sometimes you need someone else to point out the obvious...Thanks.

Mute, yes in my desperation I did try to do the geometric sum by taking n into the exponent but I thought you can only do this when the term under the exponent has an abs value <1? I did look at the case where the angular wavenumber \nu is an integer and of course the sum diverges for these values (can you believe I still didn't see the Dirac??). To add further to my ignorance I did actually see the pattern experimentally in the amplitude sprectrum...aaargh

Thanks again to both.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K