Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Infinite sum over exponentials

  1. Aug 25, 2011 #1
    Hi,

    I am looking at waves that go around a ring (monochromatic solution) and got stuck with the following expression:

    [itex]\sum_{n=-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{-2\pi i n k}[/itex]

    where k is an angular wavenumber that can take any real value. Anyone got an idea how to approach this?

    Thanks.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 25, 2011 #2

    uart

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

  4. Aug 25, 2011 #3

    Mute

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    One way to see the result uart posted is as follows:

    Split the sum up into two sums, one from -infinity to -1 and one from 0 to infinity, and then change variables in the first sum from n to -n. Both series are just geometric series, so you can perform the two sums using the geometric series formula and add the results together. The result you find might be unexpected to you. However, you're not done there - there is are particular values of k for which you can't use the geometric series formula. What happens to the sum at those values of k?
     
  5. Aug 26, 2011 #4
    Uart - of course, how could I not see it!! Sometimes you need someone else to point out the obvious....Thanks.

    Mute, yes in my desperation I did try to do the geometric sum by taking n into the exponent but I thought you can only do this when the term under the exponent has an abs value <1? I did look at the case where the angular wavenumber \nu is an integer and of course the sum diverges for these values (can you believe I still didn't see the Dirac??). To add further to my ignorance I did actually see the pattern experimentally in the amplitude sprectrum.......aaargh

    Thanks again to both.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Infinite sum over exponentials
  1. Infinite sum (Replies: 31)

Loading...