Infinitely differentiable functions

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter AxiomOfChoice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentiable Functions
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of infinitely differentiable functions, particularly those that are nonzero only on a closed interval [-b, b]. Participants explore the implications of this property on the behavior of the function and its derivatives, focusing on bounds related to the function's growth outside this interval.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether |F(x)| can be bounded by C(x+b)^k for some integer k > 2, given that F is nonzero only on [-b, b].
  • Another participant clarifies that if F is infinitely differentiable on (-b, b) but not continuous at the endpoints, then the boundedness conclusion would not follow trivially.
  • A participant interprets the original post as indicating that F has support in [-b, b] and suggests that the claim could be true, proposing a method to show that |f(x)| is bounded in a neighborhood of -b.
  • One participant realizes they overlooked the fact that F is nonzero only on [-b, b] and suggests considering the maximum value of the derivative on this interval.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about why all derivatives of F at -b must be zero, asking for clarification on the reasoning behind this claim.
  • Another participant proposes a method involving a transformation and limits to demonstrate that |f(y)| can be bounded by Cx^k for certain conditions on k.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing interpretations of the properties of the function F and its derivatives. There is no consensus on the implications of F being nonzero only on [-b, b], and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific bounds and behaviors of the function.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about continuity and differentiability at the endpoints of the interval are not fully explored, and the implications of these assumptions on the overall claims are not resolved.

AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
Suppose I have an infinitely differentiable function F that is nonzero exactly on a set [-b,b]. Can I say that [itex]|F(x)| \leq C(x+b)^k[/itex] for some integer [itex]k > 2[/itex]? If so, why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you saying that F is infinitely differentiable on the open interval (-b,b) but not necessarily continuous at the two endpoints of the closed interval [-b,b]? Because if it were continuous on the whole close interval [-b,b], then it would be bounded, so the conclusion would follow pretty trivially.
 
lugita15 said:
Are you saying that F is infinitely differentiable on the open interval (-b,b) but not necessarily continuous at the two endpoints of the closed interval [-b,b]?

I think that OP is saying that [itex]f[/itex] has support [itex][-b,b][/itex]. In any case, assuming that my interpretation is correct, I think that the claim is true. If [itex]f[/itex] is supported in [itex][-b,b][/itex], then certainly [itex]f^{(k)}(-b) = 0[/itex] for all [itex]k \in \mathbb{N}[/itex]. Since the [itex]k[/itex]-th derivative of [itex](x+b)^k[/itex] is [itex]k![/itex], it should be possible to show that [itex]|f(x)| \leq |x+b|^k[/itex] in some neighborhood of [itex]-b[/itex]. Then by choosing the constant [itex]C[/itex] appropriately, this would prove the claim. I have not checked to see if this works, but it sounds like a decent way to attack the problem.
 
Ooops, I ignored that it was nonzero only on [-b, b]. So the function is zero everywhere else.

To the OP, you likely have to do something with looking at the maximum value of the derivatve on [-b, b].
 
jgens said:
If [itex]f[/itex] is supported in [itex][-b,b][/itex], then certainly [itex]f^{(k)}(-b) = 0[/itex] for all [itex]k \in \mathbb{N}[/itex].
I feel a little bad about this, but I don't see why this is. Could you explain, please? Is it just because, since [itex]f(x) = 0[/itex] for [itex]x \leq -b[/itex], we must have [itex]f'(x) = 0[/itex] for [itex]x < -b[/itex], so by continuity of the derivative, [itex]f'(-b)[/itex] can't possibly be anything other than zero? (And then the same argument is repeated for the higher order derivatives.)
 
Last edited:
This can basically be done for any k >= 1. Let y = x + b. Then we get F(y) is zero outside of [0,2b].

We need to show F(y) <= Cy^k

Let g(y) = 0 if y=0
= f(y)/(x^k) if y =/=0

Note g is obviously continuous except possibly at y=0. However F is differentible at y=0 and zero to the left of 0. So all the derivatives of F at 0 are 0. Hence By l'hospital's rule lim y ->0 g(y) = 0. So g is continuous. Hence |g(y)| <= C for all y in [0,2b]. So |f(y)|/(x^k) <= C so
|f(y)| <= Cx^k for all y in [0,2b]. Assuming k is even we get that |f(y)| <= Cx^k for all x. If k is odd we can only get |f(y)| <= Cx^k for all positive x.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K