Infinity x Zero: James' Math Problem

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter James Has Questions
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinity Zero
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical concepts of infinity and zero, particularly in the context of limits and their implications in functions such as y = 1/x. Participants explore the definitions and behaviors of these concepts within the framework of real numbers and extended real numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • James asserts that when x approaches infinity in the function y = 1/x, y approaches zero, and he proposes that this leads to the conclusion that infinity times zero equals one.
  • One participant emphasizes that infinity is not a member of the real numbers and that limits must be used to analyze behavior as x approaches infinity or zero, rather than substituting these values directly into equations.
  • Another participant clarifies that while 1/0 can be defined as infinity in extended real numbers, the expression 0*(1/0) is not defined, highlighting the limitations of these definitions.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of limits, with one participant explaining how to rigorously approach the concept of infinity in mathematical terms, using the example of y = (3x + 4)/(x - 2) as x approaches infinity.
  • James questions whether y approaches zero when x is infinity in the context of the graph of y = 1/x, acknowledging that infinity is not a real number and thus complicates the discussion.
  • Another participant notes that x = 0 is not in the domain of the function f(x) = 1/x, reinforcing the idea that certain values cannot be included in the analysis.
  • One participant briefly mentions L'Hospital's Rule as a method to evaluate limits, suggesting a mathematical approach to the problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the treatment of infinity and zero in mathematical expressions. While some agree on the necessity of using limits, there is no consensus on the implications of these concepts, particularly regarding the relationship between infinity and zero.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the undefined nature of certain expressions involving zero and infinity, the dependence on the definitions of real and extended real numbers, and the unresolved mathematical steps in the discussion.

James Has Questions
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am a high school student, and I am doing extension mathematics, and me and the rest of the class always get into big arguments about number planes. I say that on a basic 2d numberline with a parabola or hyperbola, when x = infinity, y = 1/infinity, which I think is zero, but they think otherwise. And I also think 1/0 equals infinity. If this relationship is true, infinity times zero equals one! I know it all comes down to limits but, please, someone label me victorious or put me out of my misery.

From James

P.S. sorry if this is the wrong newsgroup I wasn't sure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You cannot just plug in infinity and zero into certain equations like y = 1/x and then expect it to obey the 'normal rules'. For a start, infinity isn't a member of the Real numbers, it's a member of the extended Reals.

When you're doing this kind of thing you need to instead use 'limits'. Rather than just put in x=infinity, you consider what happens when x gets really big (or sometimes when x gets really small).

For instance, what is [tex]y = \frac{3x+4}{x-2}[/tex] at x=infinity? If you just wack in x=infinty you might give the naive answer y=1. However, that would be wrong. With some thought you can do the following

[tex]y = \frac{3x+4}{x-2} = \frac{3+\frac{4}{x}}{1-\frac{2}{x}}[/tex]

Now as x-> infinity, the 4/x and 2/x parts go to zero and you end up with y=3.

Because of this requirement to 'approach infinity' rather than just put in infinity, you can't say things like 1/0 = infinity means 1 = 0*infinity. I could just double each side to get 2 = 0*infinity, so that means 1=2. Clearly this is wrong and is a sign you've assumed you can do a certain operation you shouldn't.

It is true that in the limit as x->0, 1/x goes to infinity, but I'd be extremely weary of putting equals signs there without mentioning limits or you'll end up proving 1=2.

What exactly do your friends think the value of 1/infinity is anyway? By using limits (so it's rigorous) you can show that if they think it's any number other than zero, they are wrong. For instance, suppose they think it's k, where k is really really small.

So you've y = k on the y=1/x line. Just pick x to be bigger than 2/k, and you'll see that the limit is less than their guess, so they are wrong.
 
The first thing to remember is that the number line does not have infinity on it. So 1/0 or 1/infinity are not questions about the number line. Let's switch to calling the number line the Real numbers which we will denote by R.

So, this is not actually a question about R. We have to 'add' something to R to start to make sense of it. The thing we commonly add is a symbol [itex]\infty[/itex] and it is true that 1/0=[itex]\infty[/itex] and 1/[itex]\infty[/itex]=0 are definitions we make, but we do not define 0*(1/0) even in this extended set of numbers (just as we do not define 1/0 in R).

Where do these choices come from? They do indeed come from taking limits of things like 1/x as x tends to zero: this is can be made arbitrarily large by taking x arbitrarily close to zero. So we add the limit in and get a new number larger than all real numbers.

Sometimes people also extend the real numbers to include -[itex]\infty[/itex], sometimes people don't: it depends on what you want to do with things.

In any case, (1/0)*0 can't be defined to make sense.
 
Ok

Wow! Thanks guys, I'll show this to my friends and we can all look back and laugh. But in the in graph, just say, y=1/x, when x=infinity would y=0? or is 0 a discontinuity to everything even ifinity. But I suppose, you wouldn't write that in a textbook because infinity is not a real number, so it wouldn't really count.
 
x=0 is not in the domain of the function f(x)=1/x, nor can we extend f to some continuous function F where x=0 IS in F's domain.
 
Last edited:
James Has Questions said:
when x=infinity

as has been pointed out twice infinity is not an element of the real numbers (the number line, in your language).
 
Alright thanks
 
Just us L'Hospital's Rule, giving 3/1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
9K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K