Inflation: Definition & Effects on Rates

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kyoma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inflation
Click For Summary
Inflation is defined as a positive change in the price of goods measured in currency, typically resulting from an increase in the supply of money relative to the availability of goods and services. An increase in demand for goods and services generally leads to higher prices, contributing to inflation. The discussion also touches on quantitative easing (QE), which involves the central bank creating new money to stimulate the economy, potentially leading to inflation if not managed carefully. Real-world examples, such as the impact of QE on oil prices, illustrate the complexities of inflation dynamics. Ultimately, inflation can occur due to various factors, including increased demand, supply constraints, and changes in currency value.
  • #61
Wow Woowee looks like massive inflation if these price increases work their way into consumer products.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
IMO - the only thing holding inflation back is the interest rate. Now Moody's and S&P are warning the US the AAA rating could be lowered.
 
  • #63
hamster143 said:
The projected scale of QE2 is consistently quoted as at least $1 trilion (6.7% of GDP) and potentially $2 trillion (13.3% of GDP). I'm not sure where your 3.5% of GDP number comes from.

Projected by whom?

The Federal Reserve Board has authorized the bank to purchase up to $600B in Treasurys. This is commonly referred to as QE2 in the media. The actual amount purchased and pledged to be purchased is much less, at approximately $400B.

As for growth impacts, let's do some rudimentary static analysis. Assume a constant multiplier of approximately 2, and that the whole $600B is spent. This means $1.2T in wealth is injected into the economy, and must be absorbed either by price increases or new growth. If the full amount is absorbed by growth, then the economy will expand by $1.2T over 12 months due to the Board's actions, an impressive stimulus by any measure. Again, this is simplistic and rudimentary, but illustrates the point. Obviously, some of that money will be lost in both price increases and buybacks by the Fed as securities come to term. Further, the currency is injected over time, and not all at once.

But this is sufficient to demonstrate the Board's intent.
 
  • #64
talk2glenn said:
As for growth impacts, let's do some rudimentary static analysis. Assume a constant multiplier of approximately 2, and that the whole $600B is spent. This means $1.2T in wealth is injected into the economy, and must be absorbed either by price increases or new growth.

Or consumed by deficit consumption. The 600 billion of federal debt paper that no one would buy that is being "printed" by the federal reserve private bank. In which case there will be zero growth. But at least there will not be 1.2 trillion contraction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 120 ·
5
Replies
120
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
526
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K