Influence of friction in pivot point(s)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mech_LS24
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Pivot
Click For Summary
In a structure with five pivot points using deep groove ball bearings, the calculated total friction loss is 0.75%, significantly lower than the 100% friction loss associated with plain bearings. The discussion highlights the need for accurate calculations of friction at each joint, emphasizing the importance of bearing type and dimensions in these calculations. Participants suggest a multi-step approach to determine friction torque and power, incorporating angular velocities and external forces. The conversation also touches on the complexities of modeling linkages and the impact of pin diameter on friction losses. Understanding these factors is crucial for effective design and operation of mechanical systems.
  • #31
Thanks @jrmichler , really appreciate your help. I am working on your last comment, expect coming back to you tomorrow.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
I think I got the results. In summary (pictures are attached):

Forces are:
Fa = 125 N
Fb = 125 N
Fc = 125 N
Fd = 125 N

Angular velocities:
Wd = 6 RAD/s
Wc = 4,38 RAD/s
Wb = 4,38 RAD/s
Wa = 6 RAD/s

Do these results/calculations seems correct? Or did I miss something?

Could you help me on my way to calculate the friction at each point? :)
 

Attachments

  • v5.89_fbd_static.jpg
    v5.89_fbd_static.jpg
    19.3 KB · Views: 177
  • v5.89_dyn_fbd.jpg
    v5.89_dyn_fbd.jpg
    21.3 KB · Views: 150
  • v5.89_dyn_fbd_02.jpg
    v5.89_dyn_fbd_02.jpg
    17.2 KB · Views: 171
  • v5.89_calc_static_01.jpg
    v5.89_calc_static_01.jpg
    28.5 KB · Views: 152
  • v5.89_dyn_calc.jpg
    v5.89_dyn_calc.jpg
    37.4 KB · Views: 143
  • v5.89_calc_results.jpg
    v5.89_calc_results.jpg
    35.4 KB · Views: 171
  • #33
Numbers on the FBD's please. It's too much switching back and forth without them. The easier you make it for somebody else to follow, the easier it is to check your own work. And those other people are more willing to look into it.
 
  • Like
Likes Mech_LS24
  • #34
Sorry, I thought you didn't prefer the numbers as you said
jrmichler said:
Like the sketch below, except with the dimensions, forces, and angles labelled.

I have modified the sketches and add the numbers on it. Like to hear if it makes sense:smile:

EDIT: I see the pictures aren't sharp if you download them. Strange, because before attached them, they are pretty nice, even when the zoom function is used...
 

Attachments

  • FBD_calc_dyn.jpg
    FBD_calc_dyn.jpg
    42.9 KB · Views: 148
  • FBD_dyn.jpg
    FBD_dyn.jpg
    23.2 KB · Views: 155
  • FBD_static_calc.jpg
    FBD_static_calc.jpg
    24.6 KB · Views: 160
  • #35
https://ibb.co/SNdtmdg

https://ibb.co/MSxvNPz

https://ibb.co/6DD96S7This works better
 
  • #36
Let's work on the static FBD by itself. Your solution has a horizontal force at C that is not counteracted by a moment at D, so the sum of moments about D is not zero. It needs to be zero.

A good way to double check your work is by taking the sum of moments about A, B, C, D, and G. All of them must sum to zero. You only need the resultant force to calculate bearing loads.

You can embed images in the post by converting to JPG format, then using Attach files > Insert > Full image. That's the best way to do it.
 
  • Like
Likes Mech_LS24
  • #37
I re-calculated the forces and added a moment around D, without the moment indeed, the force Cx didn't sum to zero.

Afterwards I checked the forces with the FBD and moment around A, G and B. I found a silly mistake here, I missed the force in point B and C. I thought these were internal force and therefore didn't take them into account. Could you explain when those are internal forces and how to recognize them?

The moment in D doesn't play a role in the friction as I understand? This feels strange haha.

See attached the files.

v5-89_FBD_Friction_Static.jpg

v5-89_FBD_Friction_Static (2).jpg
 
  • #38
In the case of this linkage, an internal force would be the force inside a link. Link AB, for example, has an internal compressive force (and stress). In a linkage, the forces at each pinned joint are external forces, so each link needs its own FBD.

You are correct, the moment in D does not play a role in calculating friction. It may feel strange at this time, but with more practice at analyzing linkages and trusses, the strangeness will go away.

The next step in calculating friction is a diagram similar to the one in Post #22. It is good practice to have all angular velocity arrows on a single diagram in the same direction - clockwise or counterclockwise. If a particular link is rotating opposite to the arrow, that angular velocity will be negative.
 
  • #39
jrmichler said:
Link AB, for example, has an internal compressive force (and stress).
What do you mean with internal compressive force?

Is this meant with the angular velocity arrows?

Besides, I have read the SKF documentation for the friction calculation. They refer to a torque calculator on their site named, SKF bearing tool. I am not quite familiar with that yet. Is there an other more general way to calculate the friction?
Ang_velocity_arrows.jpg
 
  • #40
The diagram in Post #25 is well done, but has wrong angular velocities. The diagram in Post #22 is well done, especially the dashed line diagram showing the linkage position after small displacement of the input link. Now compare the rotations of each link to your calculated angular velocity for each link. Focus on the direction of the angular velocity.

The SKF documentation is the easy way to calculate rolling element bearing friction. If you want to learn more, try search terms antifriction bearings calculations. The first hit was this: https://web.iitd.ac.in/~hirani/lec32.pdf. It's a good summary of friction in rolling element bearings. Note how many of the inputs are found experimentally.
 
  • Like
Likes Mech_LS24
  • #41
jrmichler said:
Now compare the rotations of each link to your calculated angular velocity for each link. Focus on the direction of the angular velocity.
Do you mean I should focus on the 'links' rather than the rods? The rotation of each link should be...?:
C = CW
B = CW
D = CCW
A = CCW

jrmichler said:
The SKF documentation is the easy way to calculate rolling element bearing friction. If you want to learn more, try search terms antifriction bearings calculations. The first hit was this: https://web.iitd.ac.in/~hirani/lec32.pdf. It's a good summary of friction in rolling element bearings. Note how many of the inputs are found experimentally.
Going to read/study this, thanks.
 
  • #42
I tried to calculate the friction with the support of the documentation you have sent in post #41 @jrmichler , this are my results. The documentation link is here.

Total lost of momentum = 23.192 Nmm (see calculation)

I compared it with the SKF calculator and the outcome for the SKF was 19.1 Nmm, but this is for each bearing I think. In my calculation I multiplied the Mp (Moment due to load) by 4 because I have 4 pivot points. When I multiply the SKF data by 4 I will have an outcome of 76.4 Nmm.

I guess I miss something in my calculation but can't figure out what.

Bearing: 6001-2RSH

Calculations:
Friction_bearing_fbd.jpg

Friction_bearing.jpg
 
  • #43
Get two bearings - one a deep groove ball bearing such as a 6001-2RS, the other a pillow block bearing about the same size. Hold them in your hands and rotate the inner race. You will notice that one of them has far more friction torque than the other.

There are many different designs and types of oil seals, and each type will have different friction. The SKF calculator is for the specific seals used in their bearings. The PDF - who knows? The CR Seal catalog, with its 225 pages of seal goodness, will give you an idea of the different seals available: https://www.skf.com/binaries/pub12/...1_CRSeals_Handbook_Jan_2019_tcm_12-318140.pdf.

Sometimes, and this is one of those times, you have to get the best information you can find, make your best estimate, add a safety factor, and hope for the best.
 
  • Like
Likes Mech_LS24
  • #44
Thanks @jrmichler . This has been a great learning moment for me. Bit by bit I getting better in approaching mechanical challenges (I guess :smile:). I really appreciate your patience and offered support.
 
  • Like
Likes jrmichler

Similar threads

Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
17K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K