Information loss in polarization.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the behavior of a single photon as it interacts with a polarization filter, specifically addressing the concepts of information gain and loss during this quantum measurement process. When a photon passes through a polarizer, its orientation becomes definitively known, yet the information regarding its polarization with respect to other axes is irretrievably lost. The conversation also explores the irreversibility of this quantum event, suggesting a connection to the arrow of time and the second law of thermodynamics, as the act of measurement alters the state of the photon in a way that cannot be reversed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Understanding of probability amplitude wave functions
  • Knowledge of polarization and polarizing filters
  • Familiarity with noncommuting observables in quantum physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of quantum measurement on state functions
  • Explore the concept of superposition in quantum mechanics
  • Research the relationship between quantum mechanics and thermodynamics
  • Investigate the role of noncommuting observables in quantum state measurement
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in the implications of quantum measurement and the nature of information in quantum systems.

anorlunda
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
11,326
Reaction score
8,755
A single photon approaches a polarization filter. It's orientation is described by a probability amplitude wave function. It is not reflected or absorbed, but passes through the filter. Now it's orientation immediately after is definitely known.

Question 1: is there no information/enthalpy gain/loss in this event?

Question 2: it seems that this event could not be time reversible. We can not have an event where a photon of orientation known to be the same as the filter, passes through and becomes a photon of unknown orientation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to consider the polarization with respect to different axes noncommuting observables.

When you put the photon on a filter, you are choosing to measure the polarization with respect to some axis. Let's say it passes through a 0 degree polarizer. Now you know it would definitely pass through a second 0 degree polarizer and would surely not pass through a 90 degree. But what about a polarizer oriented at any angle between? You don't know, and you're back in a superposition of amplitudes to either pass through or not. There is one angle where it is deterministic, but all the others have some doubt. I know that wasn't exactly what you had in mind, but that's as close as you get because there's no way you could make a measurement, then end up knowing less about the photon.

You are right that the information about the photon's polarization with respect to axes x-y is lost when you measure the polarization with respect to rotated axis x'-y'.
 
I'll try to rephrase my question. (These forums are great. If you don't formulate your question carefully, you don't get answers.)

A quantum state may be observable (such as by passing a photon through a polarizing filter), but there is no such thing as unobservation. The known orientation of the photon after the filter can never be restored to the wave function of probability amplitudes it had before the filter.

Is this not an arrow of time; that we can observe quantum states but never unobserve?

Is it related to the second law of thermodynamics?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K