I Information lost at the Big Crunch?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential loss of information during a hypothetical Big Crunch scenario, questioning whether the universe's physical states and laws could be erased. Participants emphasize the importance of defining "information" in a physical context to address the question effectively. The conversation references John Wheeler's idea of Mutability, suggesting that extreme conditions during a Big Crunch could alter physical laws and reprocess universal information. However, it is noted that these inquiries remain speculative and lack grounding in established physics theories. Ultimately, the thread concludes that without a solid theoretical basis, the questions posed are unanswerable and off-topic.
Suekdccia
Messages
352
Reaction score
30
TL;DR Summary
Would it be possible to truly erase information if the Big Bang ended in a Big Crunch?
Let's imagine for a moment that the universe stopped expanding somehow (even though the evidence we have suggests this is not going to happen) and gravity made it contract until reaching a Big Crunch state.

According to our actual understanding of physics and our current working models, Is it possible that the information about the universe (the information about its physical states and laws of physics) is lost at the Big Crunch? In what conditions at the Big Crunch would the information be "erased" and in what conditions it may survive? For example, if the entropy or the density st the Big Crunch is too big, information would be lost?...
 
Space news on Phys.org
What definition of information are you using? Without a physical definition, the question can't be answered.

Try reading this PF Insights article first. Pay close attention to the difference between information and knowledge, because almost all confusion in this topic results from loose definitions of information.

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/how-to-better-define-information-in-physics/

For example, we think the universe is electrically neutral. The number of positive charges equals the number of negative charges. That's information. If the universe is still neutral after a crunch, isn't that conserving that information?
 
anorlunda said:
What definition of information are you using? Without a physical definition, the question can't be answered.

Try reading this PF Insights article first. Pay close attention to the difference between information and knowledge, because almost all confusion in this topic results from loose definitions of information.

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/how-to-better-define-information-in-physics/

For example, we think the universe is electrically neutral. The number of positive charges equals the number of negative charges. That's information. If the universe is still neutral after a crunch, isn't that conserving that information?
I basically asked this question after reading a couple of authors describing John Wheeler's idea of Mutability [1] where he basically defended a Big Crunch-Big Bang oscillatory model where all the laws of physics (even the most fundamental ones) would change between cycles.

These authors (Clement Vidal [2] and Paul Davies [3]) describe that this is possible if the Big Crunch is such an extreme event that would reprocess all the information of the universe and would therefore change the physical laws of the universe. They seem to refer to information as entropy but I am not sure.

Therefore I am asking: What would be necessary to happen at the Big Crunch to erase all the information about the physical states of the universe? What conditions would be necessary to eliminated that information and reshape the laws of physics?

[1]: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2602-4_9

[2]: https://books.google.com/books?id=6... assume that the densities" "wheeler"&f=false

[3]: https://books.google.com/books?id=W...reme physical state that information"&f=false
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Suekdccia said:
What would be necessary to happen at the Big Crunch to erase all the information about the physical states of the universe? What conditions would be necessary to eliminated that information and reshape the laws of physics?
These questions are unanswerable because the whole idea you refer to is speculative and is not based on any existing theory of physics. Which means the answer is purely a matter of opinion. That is off topic in this forum.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes anorlunda
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top