Information Theory: Data Processing Inequality, violation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the data processing inequality (DPI) in the context of a speech signal with frequency content exceeding 300 Hz, to which noise below 300 Hz is added. The participant observes an increase in mutual information after applying a high-pass filter, leading to a perceived violation of DPI. It is clarified that the DPI does not prohibit an increase in mutual information when noise is introduced; rather, it asserts that the mutual information between the input and output must maintain a specific relationship. The confusion arises from the non-stationary nature of the input signal and its potential deviation from Markov chain assumptions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of data processing inequality (DPI)
  • Familiarity with mutual information concepts
  • Knowledge of signal processing techniques, specifically high-pass filtering
  • Basic principles of stationary and non-stationary signals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of data processing inequality in non-stationary signals
  • Explore mutual information calculations in signal processing
  • Learn about the properties and applications of high-pass filters
  • Investigate Markov chains and their relevance to information theory
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and practitioners in information theory, signal processing engineers, and anyone interested in the nuances of mutual information and data processing inequalities.

dezeegt
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Let's suppose I have a speech signal with frequency content >300 Hz. I then add noise to this signal, that happens to be somewhere below 300 Hz. I then high-pass filter the signal (300+ Hz) and I have increased the mutual information and seemingly violated the data processing inequality.

Can anyone explain why this can occur? I assume it's because the data processing inequality does not apply since the input signal is not stationary and it's probably not really a Markov chain...but I'm not sure.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By "data processing inequality" I guess you mean this: http://www.vis.caltech.edu/~zoltan/szeged4/img9.htm

By "increased the mutual information" I assume you mean, increased the mutual information between the signal and the output of the high-pass filter, by adding the noise. But the data processing inequality doesn't say the inclusion of R1 can't increase I(S, R2), it only says I(S,R1) > I(S,R2). There's no contradiction.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K