Information traveling faster than light

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of information traveling faster than light, specifically through thought experiments involving gears and a long pole. Participants explore the implications of these scenarios on the understanding of speed limits in physics, particularly in relation to the speed of sound and rigidity of materials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a thought experiment involving a series of gears to question whether the last gear could turn instantaneously, suggesting this might convey information faster than light.
  • Another participant counters that actions taken at one end of the gears travel at the speed of sound, which is slower than the speed of light.
  • A similar thought experiment is presented regarding a long pole, questioning if pushing one end would cause the other end to move instantaneously and whether this would constitute sending information faster than light.
  • Participants reference a common question regarding the behavior of a rigid rod and provide a link to a discussion on the topic.
  • One participant expresses curiosity about how long an object would need to be for the time delay in movement to be noticeable by human eyes, suggesting a length of 600 meters based on the speed of sound in steel.
  • Another participant elaborates on the speed of sound in steel and the perception of time lag, noting that the non-rigidity of a long steel rod would affect its behavior, making it behave more like a flexible cable rather than a rigid bar.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the speed of sound limits the transmission of information in the proposed scenarios, but there remains a lack of consensus on the implications of rigidity and the perception of time delays in these contexts.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations related to the assumptions of rigidity in materials and the dependence on the speed of sound, as well as the unresolved nature of how these factors interact with the concept of information transfer.

MiLara
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I know there is a modern paradigm that states that nothing, including information, can travel faster than the speed of light. (With exception to quantum entanglement, but I'm not going to pretend like I know the exact details of that subject).

Thought experiment.

Imagine there are a series of gears in a row that span a much greater length than 3*10^8 meters. Now let's say you turn the gear at the beginning and it sets off a reaction to the other gears down line from the beginning. Could the last gear turn "instantaneously" or much under 1 second after the first gear is turned? Would this then be considered information being conveyed at faster than the speed of light? What are the limitations of such a device, and how much would friction or any other factors play a roll in the time delay from the first gear turning to the last.

Now let's imagine a really long pole that is much longer that 3*10^8 meters. If you were to all of a sudden push that pole perfectly straight forward from one end, it seems like the other end would move at that exact moment because it is a rigid body. Would this be considered sending information faster than the speed of light, or even sending information instantaneously?

Now, I'm sure I'm not clever enough to have created such an simple device that seems to defy the laws of physics, and to that end, I'd love for someone to tell me what I am missing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actions taken at one end of your gears or the pole travel at the speed of sound through the material, which is much slower than c.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stephanus and MiLara
MiLara said:
Now let's imagine a really long pole that is much longer that 3*10^8 meters. If you were to all of a sudden push that pole perfectly straight forward from one end, it seems like the other end would move at that exact moment because it is a rigid body. Would this be considered sending information faster than the speed of light, or even sending information instantaneously?
This is a pretty commonly asked question. Here is a good reference that discusses it

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/can-i-send-a-signal-faster-than-light-by-pushing-a-rigid-rod/

The gears proposal would also be limited in the same way.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MiLara and Drakkith
MiLara said:
Thank you! That was very helpful. Now I wonder how long an object would have to be in order for the time delay to be noticed by human eyes.
Hmm, good question. Since movies play at like 22 or so frames per second, I would say that you could probably detect something at 100 ms for sure. The speed of sound in steel is about 6000 m/s, so you should be able to see it in a 600 m length.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stephanus and stoomart
MiLara said:
Now I wonder how long an object would have to be in order for the time delay to be noticed by human eyes.
The speed of sound in solid steel is somewhere around 6 kilometers/second, and the human eye can distinguish events separated by maybe a tenth of a second... So you might think that under ideal conditions an alert person might just barely be able to perceive the time lag between pushing one end of a 600 meter steel rod and the other end moving.

There's no relativity involved here, this is just about steel not being perfectly rigid. On the one hand, six km/sec is about one five-thousandth the speed of light, far too small for any relativistic effects to appear. On the other hand, the non-rigidity of a 600 meter steel rod is going to be very apparent; it will behave more like a steel cable, all stretchy and flexible, than a rigid bar.

[edit: Dale beat me to it!]
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stephanus, Dale and stoomart
Nugatory said:
the non-rigidity of a 600 meter steel rod is going to be very apparent; it will behave more like a steel cable, all stretchy and flexible, than a rigid bar.

Like these, for example...
rails.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stephanus

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K