Infrared Waves vs. Radio Waves Frequency

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jfio93
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
jfio93
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
compared to the frequency of radio waves the frequency of infared waves is i keep getting this wrong, i look at my physics reference table and it clearly shows that infared waves have a greater frequency . but compared to the frequency of radio waves the frequency of infared waves is less according to my teacher
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi jfio93! welcome to pf! :smile:

radio waves have a very long wavelength …

that's why radio telescopes are so large, and don't need to be smooth …

and a long wavelength means a low frequency :wink:

(so infrared is higher frequency than radio waves, but lower than light and Xrays etc)
 
Like Tim said, the frequency and wavelength of waves (which includes light) is inverse. The longer the wavelength, the smaller the frequency.

Radio waves have a very long (or large) wavelength, and thus, a very small frequency. Infared has a shorter (smaller) wavelength, and a higher frequency than radio waves.

Perhaps you or your teacher is thinking of wavelength instead of frequency?

Wavelength is the distance between two like points on a wave, like between peaks or between the valleys, and frequency is the number of cycles the wave does in one second. Like how many peaks pass a point in one second.
 
In reference to what your teacher told you, not the guys above me.

Sometimes teachers are wrong. Remember, there is no arrogance in questioning authority.
 
Last edited: