Initial Speed and Projectile Motion

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the initial speed of a golf ball in projectile motion, given its maximum height of 4.98 meters and horizontal range of 24.8 meters. The user employs kinematic equations to determine the time of flight and the final velocity components, noting that the vertical velocity at maximum height is zero. The user initially struggles with converting velocity components to speed but is reminded to use the Pythagorean theorem for magnitude calculation. After correcting an error in the x-component calculation, the user confirms that adding the velocity components as vectors will yield the initial velocity of the ball. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding projectile motion principles and accurately applying kinematic equations.
Rubber Ducky
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The path of a golf ball over level ground reaches a height of 4.98m and a horizontal range of 24.8m. What is the ball's initial speed?

So it's a projectile motion problem. I draw a graph showing the parabolic trajectory of the ball, with the start point at the origin. It's final x = 24.8m and final y = 0m

Homework Equations



We have three constant acceleration equations we use in my course:

\vec{v}_{fx} = \vec{v}_{ix} + \vec{a}_{x}t

Ensuring everything is in the same direction (vertical or horizontal), final velocity = initial velocity + acceleration * time

\vec{x}_{f} = \vec{x}_{i} + \vec{v}_{ix}t + \frac{1}{2}\vec{a}_{x}t^2

Looks like an integral. Final position = initial position + initial velocity * time + half acceleration * t squared

\vec{v}_{fx}^2 = \vec{v}_{ix}^2 + 2\vec{a}_{x}Δ\vec{x}

Final velocity squared = initial velocity squared + double acceleration * displacement

The Attempt at a Solution



My prof posted a video meant to give hints that will help us get started on the problem. I can try linking it here, though I'm not sure it'll work:

https://dal.echo360.com:8443/ess/echo/presentation/7b597979-18b5-413e-8a63-0aca1db8801d

Basically what it says is that, the motion is parabolic, I know the max height, and we know from class that the velocity at a projectile at max height is 0.

I then draw a graph with only half the parabola, starting at (x,y) = (0,4.98) and ending at (24.8, 0).

Then I have:

\vec{a}_{y} = -9.8m/s/s
\vec{v}_{iy} = 0m/s
\vec{y}_{i} = 4.98m
\vec{x}_{f} = 24.8m
t = ?
vf = ?

I use the second equation I listed above to find t:

0m = 4.98m + (0m/s)t + 1/2(-9.8m/s/s)t^2
0m = 4.98m - (4.98m/s/s)t^2
(4.9m/s/s)t^2 = 4.98m
t = 1.0081302s

I keep in mind that this is only the time for half the parabola, so if I use this for the whole thing, I will need to double it.

We know from class also that the velocity at the end of a projectile's path is equal to but opposite in direction of the initial velocity. We also know that if we find the x and y components of the final velocity, we can add them to obtain the final velocity.

For the y component, I use equation 2 from above:

\vec{v}_{fy} = \vec{v}_{iy} + \vec{a}_{y}t
\vec{v}_{fy} = 0m/s + (-9.8m/s/s)(1.0081302s)
\vec{v}_{fy} = -9.87968m/s

For the x component, I use equation 2 (acceleration along x is always 0m/s/s for projectiles, we learned in class):

\vec{x}_{f} = \vec{x}_{i} + \vec{v}_{ix}t + \frac{1}{2}\vec{a}_{x}t^2<br /> 24.8m = 0m + (\vec{v}_{ix})(1.0081302s) + 0<br /> 24.8m = (1.0081302s)\vec{v}_{ix}<br /> \vec{v}_{ix} = 24.599997m/s<br /> This is where my main problem is. I&#039;m guessing I did all of the above correctly, because it was simply subbing into the equations. I&#039;m just not sure how to get the initial SPEED when I have the VELOCITY components.<br /> <br /> Hopefully this is easy enough to understand, and thanks for all who read.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Rubber Ducky said:
I then draw a graph with only half the parabola, starting at (x,y) = (0,4.98) and ending at (24.8, 0).
That first point is not part of the parabola. It reaches max height at half the horizontal range.


I use the second equation I listed above to find t:

0m = 4.98m + (0m/s)t + 1/2(-9.8m/s/s)t^2
0m = 4.98m - (4.98m/s/s)t^2
(4.9m/s/s)t^2 = 4.98m
t = 1.0081302s

I keep in mind that this is only the time for half the parabola, so if I use this for the whole thing, I will need to double it.
OK.

For the y component, I use equation 2 from above:

\vec{v}_{fy} = \vec{v}_{iy} + \vec{a}_{y}t
\vec{v}_{fy} = 0m/s + (-9.8m/s/s)(1.0081302s)
\vec{v}_{fy} = -9.87968m/s
OK.

For the x component, I use equation 2 (acceleration along x is always 0m/s/s for projectiles, we learned in class):

\vec{x}_{f} = \vec{x}_{i} + \vec{v}_{ix}t + \frac{1}{2}\vec{a}_{x}t^2<br /> 24.8m = 0m + (\vec{v}_{ix})(1.0081302s) + 0<br /> 24.8m = (1.0081302s)\vec{v}_{ix}<br /> \vec{v}_{ix} = 24.599997m/s
<br /> Don&#039;t forget that the time is for <b>half</b> the motion.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> This is where my main problem is. I&#039;m guessing I did all of the above correctly, because it was simply subbing into the equations. I&#039;m just not sure how to get the initial SPEED when I have the VELOCITY components. </div> </div> </blockquote>If you have the components of any vector, use the Pythagorean theorem to find the magnitude.
 
Thanks to both of you. I don't know how I managed to miss that while reviewing my notes.

I also seem to have done the x component wrong. The initial x position was 12.4m, not 0m, which gave me the correct answer with the pythagorean theorem. Thanks again.

Now if I want the initial velocity of the ball, I can just add both velocity components, correct?
 
Rubber Ducky said:
Now if I want the initial velocity of the ball, I can just add both velocity components, correct?
As long as you "add" them as vectors, sure.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
750