Korybut
- 73
- 3
- TL;DR Summary
- Why local closedness matters?
Hello!
There is a simple line in the textbook.
If ##S## is a manifold, an injectively immersed submanifold ##M## of ##S## is embedded if and only if ##M## is locally closed in ##S##.
Recall the definition. M is locally closed if for each point ##x\in M## there open ##U\subset S## such that ##M\cap U## is closed in ##U##.
Embedding to injective immesion is simple. The opposite direction is hard.
Suppose I have ##N## as source manifold and ##f:N\rightarrow S## is the injective immersion. I need to show that "immersed" topology coincides with subspace topology. In other words: for any open ##V \subset N## I need to show that ##f(V)=M\cap U_V## where ##U## is open in S.
Immersion allows to use constant rank theorem and build chart ##(A,\phi)## with ##\phi : A \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^k## for ##A\subset N##; and chart ##(B,\psi)## with ##\psi: B\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{n+k}## for ##B\subset S##. In these charts immersion has the form
##\psi \circ f \circ \phi^{-1} :\mathbb{R}^k \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{n+k}##
##(x_1,...,x_k)\rightarrow (x_1,...,x_k,0,...0)##.
How do I proceed further?
There is a simple line in the textbook.
If ##S## is a manifold, an injectively immersed submanifold ##M## of ##S## is embedded if and only if ##M## is locally closed in ##S##.
Recall the definition. M is locally closed if for each point ##x\in M## there open ##U\subset S## such that ##M\cap U## is closed in ##U##.
Embedding to injective immesion is simple. The opposite direction is hard.
Suppose I have ##N## as source manifold and ##f:N\rightarrow S## is the injective immersion. I need to show that "immersed" topology coincides with subspace topology. In other words: for any open ##V \subset N## I need to show that ##f(V)=M\cap U_V## where ##U## is open in S.
Immersion allows to use constant rank theorem and build chart ##(A,\phi)## with ##\phi : A \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^k## for ##A\subset N##; and chart ##(B,\psi)## with ##\psi: B\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{n+k}## for ##B\subset S##. In these charts immersion has the form
##\psi \circ f \circ \phi^{-1} :\mathbb{R}^k \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{n+k}##
##(x_1,...,x_k)\rightarrow (x_1,...,x_k,0,...0)##.
How do I proceed further?