Instantaneous speed without using calculus

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rajeshmarndi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Speed
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating instantaneous speed for a particle moving along a path defined by the equation y=t². At specific time intervals (t=1s to t=4s), the total distances covered are 1m, 4m, 9m, and 16m, respectively. The instantaneous speed at t=2s is calculated as 5m/s, derived from the difference in distances at t=2s and t=3s. Corrections are made to the instantaneous speeds at t=2.1s and t=2.3s, resulting in values of 4.2m/s and 4.6m/s, respectively, demonstrating a method to estimate instantaneous speed without traditional calculus methods.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations
  • Familiarity with the concept of instantaneous speed
  • Basic knowledge of time intervals in physics
  • Ability to interpret mathematical corrections in calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the concept of limits in calculus to understand instantaneous speed
  • Study the relationship between average speed and instantaneous speed
  • Learn about kinematic equations and their applications in physics
  • Investigate alternative methods for calculating instantaneous speed without calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of motion and speed calculations.

rajeshmarndi
Messages
319
Reaction score
0
Say a particle cover y=t^2 distance.

at t=1s total distance cover = 1m
at t=2s total distance cover = 4m
at t=3s total distance cover = 9m
at t=4s total distance cover = 16m

So the instantaneous speed at t=2s is 9 - 4 = 5m i.e 5m/s.

To get the instantaneous speed at t=2s and t=3s, I take the instantaneous speed 5m/s at t=2s, as the average instantaneous speed between t=2s and t=3s as 5.

So the instantaneous speed at t=2s and t=3s become 4m and 6m. Also the instantaneous speed

at t=2.1s become 4.1
at t=2.3s become 4.3 and so on.

Here we get the instantaneous speed without using Δt→0. But I know to calculate instantaneous speed, calculus was invented.

Thanks.

[edit :]

at t=2.1s become 4.2
at t=2.3s become 4.6 and so on.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
rajeshmarndi said:
at t=2.1s become 4.1
wrong, it's 4.2
at t=2.3s become 4.3
wrong, it's 4.6

Here we get the instantaneous speed without using Δt→0.
And you get it incorrectly.

Was there as question in all of this or did you just want to demonstrate incorrect extrapolation? :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Student100 and berkeman
rajeshmarndi said:
at t=2.1s become 4.1
at t=2.3s become 4.3 and so on.
correction ...
at t=2.1s become 4.2
at t=2.3s become 4.6 and so on.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
16K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K