I Instantaneous velocity - displacement and distance

AI Thread Summary
Instantaneous velocity is defined as the first derivative of displacement with respect to time and can also be expressed as the first derivative of distance with respect to time. While both definitions yield the same result in one-dimensional motion, they do not generally equate in multidimensional scenarios. The discussion highlights the importance of context, particularly in one-dimensional cases where signed distance from the origin represents position. Clarifying these distinctions is crucial for understanding the nuances of motion in physics.
adjurovich
Messages
119
Reaction score
21
Instantaneous velocity is defined as the first derivative of displacement with respect to time:

##\vec{v} = \dfrac{d \vec{r}}{dt}##
However, instantaneous velocity is also defined as the first derivative of function of distance with respect to time:

##v = \dfrac{ds}{dt}##
Why do these two different quantities result in the same thing? We can certainly find the distance traveled between two points if we know the displacement function, why?​
 
Physics news on Phys.org
adjurovich said:
Instantaneous velocity is defined as the first derivative of displacement with respect to time:

##\vec{v} = \dfrac{d \vec{r}}{dt}##
However, instantaneous velocity is also defined as the first derivative of function of distance with respect to time:

##v = \dfrac{ds}{dt}##
Says who and where? Except as a special case in a one-dimensional setting?

adjurovich said:
Why do these two different quantities result in the same thing?​
They do not. Not generally.
 
Orodruin said:
Says who and where? Except as a special case in a one-dimensional setting?


They do not. Not generally.
How would you explain it in “special” one dimensional case?
 
The (signed) distance from the origin is the position in one dimension.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top