Instrument Calibration Intervals: Self-Calibration Accepted?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The calibration interval for laboratory instruments such as Digital Multimeters (DMMs) and oscilloscopes is typically set at one year due to the aging of components, which can significantly affect accuracy. Self-calibration using a higher accuracy bench DMM is generally not accepted in most industries, as certified calibration from an external agency is required to ensure traceability and compliance with standards. This is particularly crucial in regulated fields like pharmaceuticals, where adherence to FDA guidelines is mandatory. Calibration certificates serve as proof of compliance and accuracy for instruments used in critical applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calibration standards and procedures
  • Familiarity with Digital Multimeters (DMMs) and their calibration
  • Knowledge of traceability requirements in laboratory settings
  • Awareness of FDA calibration guidelines and regulations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the FDA calibration guidelines for laboratory instruments
  • Learn about the calibration process for Digital Multimeters (DMMs)
  • Explore the requirements for calibration certificates in regulated industries
  • Investigate the concept of traceability in measurement and calibration
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for calibration technicians, laboratory managers, quality assurance professionals, and anyone involved in the maintenance and calibration of laboratory instruments in regulated environments.

likephysics
Messages
638
Reaction score
4
Just out of curiosity why is the calibration interval 1yr for lab instruments like DMM, scope etc.
Why not 2 years.

Also, you use a higher accuracy bench DMM to calibrate a hand held DMM.

Instead of getting calibration done by an outside agency, Why not calibrate the handheld DMM yourself using an already calibrated bench DMM.
I am trying to ask if "self-calibration" is accepted in the industry.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Calibration is normally done using very high precision signal, voltage , current sources etc ( depending on the instrument being calibrated.
This is why it generally costs lots of money to get signal generators, spectrum analysers, oscilloscopes etc calibrated by a certified calibration lab.

I guess a 1 yr period was chosen as a tradeoff between calibrating too often and not enough
Components can age a lot in 12 months time and cause the calibration to become very poor
and as the instrument gets older the components will likely to age even faster

Instead of getting calibration done by an outside agency, Why not calibrate the handheld DMM yourself using an already calibrated bench DMM.
I am trying to ask if "self-calibration" is accepted in the industry.

generally ... no it wouldn't, very few labs would have the precision test equip as I mentioned above. Any business that owns instruments that need regular calibrating will be required to show proof of an independently done calibration certificate

I'm a certified Trimble service technician and the company I work for I do calibration certificates on optical surveying equip. for our customers. Those customers can be required to produce a cal cert to a project manager that they may be contracting to.

Dave
 
likephysics said:
Just out of curiosity why is the calibration interval 1yr for lab instruments like DMM, scope etc.
Why not 2 years.

Also, you use a higher accuracy bench DMM to calibrate a hand held DMM.

Instead of getting calibration done by an outside agency, Why not calibrate the handheld DMM yourself using an already calibrated bench DMM.
I am trying to ask if "self-calibration" is accepted in the industry.

It depends upon what 'the industry' needs, for a particular application. It has to depend on the particular circumstances. Sometimes, it is quite sufficient to check that results from two locally available instruments agree to within the particular required limits. You wouldn't often need to check the Mains Volts to 0.1% accuracy, for instance.
 
Equipment calibration is a huge issue when it comes to the Food & Drug Administration.

http://www.fda.gov/ScienceResearch/FieldScience/LaboratoryManual/ucm171880.htm

This procedure specifies the schedule and requirements for maintenance, performance, calibration, and verification of laboratory testing equipment. Meeting the criteria in this procedure demonstrates control of the maintenance and calibration parameters needed to achieve the accuracy of instruments used for analytical testing.

http://www.fda.gov/ScienceResearch/FieldScience/ucm171821.htm

The program for calibration of equipment demands that calibrations and measurements made by the laboratory are traceable to the International System of Units.
 
sophiecentaur said:
It depends upon what 'the industry' needs, for a particular application. It has to depend on the particular circumstances. Sometimes, it is quite sufficient to check that results from two locally available instruments agree to within the particular required limits. You wouldn't often need to check the Mains Volts to 0.1% accuracy, for instance.

Yes.

I was the calibration technician for a manufacturing facility a few decades ago. I did calibrations for electrical test instruments including voltmeters, wattmeters, power analyzers and many more. We had what we called the "in house standards", which were only used for calibrating the other instruments. The "in house standards" were generally of higher stability and accuracy than the normally used instruments. They "the in house standards" were calibrated once every six months by an outside agency. Or it may have been once a year for some instruments. My memory fails me. A calibration certificate was also issued by the outside agency for proof of traceability for each "in house standard". The frequency of calibration for the instruments used in manufacturing varied, but most of them were every month. A log was maintained for each manufacturing instrument and a sticker was placed on it after it was checked.

However, like sophiecentaur said, all of this may vary depending on the industry. The most important thing, and the thing that most all industries will have in common, is the traceability requirement.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
16K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K