Integral, a dead deer, and a tree

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Tree
AI Thread Summary
Integral suggested posting a picture of an old growth tree on the property in Oregon, estimated to be between 150 and 250 years old, with most estimates around 175 years. The tree is notable for its large lower limbs, which are considered "widow makers" due to their danger during windstorms. Integral also examined a dead deer nearby, adding a layer of interest to the discussion. The tree's health is confirmed, and it poses a potential risk to nearby structures, prompting past tree removals for safety. Overall, the conversation highlights the beauty and risks associated with old growth trees in the area.
  • #51
arildno said:
Contemplation is very nice, but it doesn't evoke grunts. It might be born of grunts, but that's the complete opposite, isn't it?
Hence, the turn-off.
I take it you are looking for impetuous then, the opposite of contemplative?

Maybe this question belongs in the other thread. :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
Astronuc said:
It looks like the tree is on the south side and slight east of your house, and there is a smaller tree just behind it. Do the winds blow predominantly from the west - ours generally do. In that case, the tree would likely not hit the house unless you get a wind from the southeast.

Its slightly west, and south of the house. The heaviest winds usually come from the south and west. :rolleyes: But, as Integral pointed out, the top third isn't really dangerous to a house.

Maybe Integral can confirm this, or not... You've heard of urban legends, well, I have a rural legend. A logger once told me about the old days and how things used to be done. He claimed that some of the best of the old time loggers would actually swing from one old growth tree to be next, by rope; sometimes over 200 feet up, and while carrying a chain saw. :eek: He claims to know one guy who still does this.

That is a really tough life. When Tsu worked at the local hospital she saw some terrible crush injuries. Not to mention all of the things that a chainsaw can do to a body.
 
  • #53
Ivan Seeking said:
Its slightly west, and south of the house. The heaviest winds usually come from the south and west. :rolleyes: But, as Integral pointed out, the top third isn't really dangerous to a house.

Maybe Integral can confirm this, or not... You've heard of urban legends, well, I have a rural legend. A logger once told me about the old days and how things used to be done. He claimed that some of the best of the old time loggers would actually swing from one old growth tree to be next, by rope; sometimes over 200 feet up, and while carrying a chain saw. :eek: He claims to know one guy who still does this.

That is a really tough life. When Tsu worked at the local hospital she saw some terrible crush injuries. Not to mention all of the things that a chainsaw can do to a body.

Oh my! I have never heard of that! Not that I have ever worked around an active logging show but my skeptic hackles are bristling. Most of the old loggers I knew were pretty well grounded! Why would a faller need to be in the canopy? HOW did he GET into the canopy? Where did the conveniently located ropes come from?

One thing that you need to keep in mind is that the common terrain that loggers must deal with is more like this:

http://home.comcast.net/~integral50/scenery/Maryspeak11.JPG \[/URL]

http://home.comcast.net/~integral50/scenery/steep.JPG[/URL] [/PLAIN]

one has to have a lot of respect for the fellow that carries a chainsaw and paraphernalia up and down a slope like that. In as sense logging is simply above ground mining, with a set of dangers which are comparable to any job on Earth considered dangerous.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #54
Integral said:
Oh my! I have never heard of that! Not that I have ever worked around an active logging show but my skeptic hackles are bristling.

Same here. but crazier things have been true...

Most of the old loggers I knew were pretty well grounded! Why would a faller need to be in the canopy? HOW did he GET into the canopy? Where did the conveniently located ropes come from?

Why did they climb the trees? Traditionally, they had the climbing spikes, so they must have had some reason. What comes to mind are the competitions at state fairs and such where they race up and down a tall pole with their spikes. It does suggest a motive to support the claim.
 
  • #55
Ivan Seeking said:
Same here. but crazier things have been true...



Why did they climb the trees? Traditionally, they had the climbing spikes, so they must have had some reason. What comes to mind are the competitions at state fairs and such where they race up and down a tall pole with their spikes. It does suggest a motive to support the claim.

In the old days they would climb into the top of a tree, cut the top out then run their rigging to the top to use the tree as a boom to haul cut logs to the landing. This was only done to a couple of trees for each logging show. Now days they have mechanical booms that serve that purpose. Drive the truck to the top of the show plant and anchor your boom and start cutting. It seems ingrained in old time Oregonians to see these big old trees more as potential logs then trees... pretty sad when you think about it.
 
  • #56
Okay I had better update my book.

Chainsaw wielding loggers probably did not swing from tree to tree like Tarzan.

Got it. :biggrin:
 
  • #57
Ivan Seeking said:
Its slightly west, and south of the house. The heaviest winds usually come from the south and west. :rolleyes: But, as Integral pointed out, the top third isn't really dangerous to a house.
I guessed a late morning shot. West and south would put the tree falling toward the northwest with highest probability. Keep that in mind.

Ivan Seeking said:
Maybe Integral can confirm this, or not... You've heard of urban legends, well, I have a rural legend. A logger once told me about the old days and how things used to be done. He claimed that some of the best of the old time loggers would actually swing from one old growth tree to be next, by rope; sometimes over 200 feet up, and while carrying a chain saw. :eek: He claims to know one guy who still does this.

That is a really tough life. When Tsu worked at the local hospital she saw some terrible crush injuries. Not to mention all of the things that a chainsaw can do to a body.
There may be some black and white movies of logging in the old days up in the NW or Alaska. They used to string cables up and down slopes to move logs.
 
  • #58
Ivan Seeking said:
Okay I had better update my book.



Got it. :biggrin:
Now I am not going to rule the possibility that once a topper was in the crown that he would not look for a short cut to the next tree. Can you imagine working your way up 100'+ into the top of a tree, cutting the top out then climbing back down 100' + walking 20' to the neighboring tree and doing it again? Oh yeah, for some reason I have this gut feeling that the 2 topped trees where pretty close together. I can see a real tempation to grap a limb from the neighboring tree and swing across rather then make the entire trip down and back up. Did they?? I do not know!

Perhaps we ought to ask Jedi Jack? He worked in the woods for a bit, he might have some tall tales to spin?!
 
  • #59
I guessed a late morning shot. West and south would put the tree falling toward the northwest with highest probability. Keep that in mind.

Actually it was evening, nearly 8pm when we took the pic.
 
  • #60
Integral said:
Now I am not going to rule the possibility that once a topper was in the crown that he would not look for a short cut to the next tree.

Oooooh, I thought that you were saying that they would only need to climb one tree per site, which would pretty much rule out the need for tree hopping.
 
  • #61
Astronuc said:
I guessed a late morning shot. West and south would put the tree falling toward the northwest with highest probability. Keep that in mind.

Really, it could fall any direction but due south. That 110 feet is the distance, going south, to the front door of my office.

I am pretty sure that we had a micro burst pass over here a few weeks ago. It was raining so hard that it was knocking the limbs off the trees. According to the weather satellite it was coming down at a rate of about 4 inches an hour. Then we got high winds and I was trapped in my office for hours. It was like a bleeping war zone out there. When we moved here I had no sense of the danger posed by large trees, but now... You gain a healthy respect after about, oh, one good storm.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top