Integral Form of Gauss' Law at Center of Finite Wire

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Gauss's Law and Ampere's Law to finite wires. It is established that at the exact center of a finite wire, the electric field cannot be defined due to the nature of point charge distributions, leading to an undefined electric field at that point. The mathematical expression for the electric field at a distance from the wire is given by E = kλ/z·[b/(z²+b²)¹/2 + a/(z²+a²)¹/2], which confirms that E is undefined when r = 0. For Ampere's Law, the magnetic field is also zero at the center of a current-carrying wire since the enclosed current is zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law and its integral form
  • Familiarity with Ampere's Law and magnetic fields
  • Knowledge of electric field calculations for line charge distributions
  • Basic calculus for evaluating integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields from line charge distributions
  • Learn about the implications of symmetry in electrostatics
  • Explore the conditions under which Gauss's Law can be applied
  • Investigate the relationship between current and magnetic fields in finite wires
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, electrical engineering, and anyone interested in understanding the limitations of Gauss's Law and Ampere's Law in specific geometries, particularly in relation to finite wire configurations.

Nate Wellington
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
At the exact center of a finite wire (i.e. a distance, say $L/2$ from each end), why can I not apply Gauss's Law in integral form to find an EXACT solution for the electric field?

At the center of the wire, $E$ is entirely radial, so it seems like I should be able to draw an infinitesimally $\epsilon$ thick cylinder as my Gaussian surface, pull $E$ out of the integral (it should be a constant in the limit $\epsilon\to 0$), and get an exact expression for the electric field. Obviously, I do not.

Could someone explain in as mathematical a way as possible why this is the case?

BTW, I have similar questions regarding Ampere's Law. It seems like I should be able to apply that to finite wires as well. I know that the reason that doesn't work is that it only works for loops of wire, but again, just from the math, I cannot explain that either.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not an expert on this, but I will give your my thought. First, I think you need to specify that by finite wire, it means a finite line charge distribution(usually uniform, as the integral is easier to work with), not a current-carrying wire. Because there is hardly any electric field around a current-carrying wire, even though there is magnetic field around it. Then by exact center, do you mean at the central point of the wire? If so, then there is no electric field defined here, because we treat charges as concrete point without structure when we considering the problem. Mathematically, electric field vertical distance z away from the wire is given by E = kλ/z·[b/(z2+b2)1/2+a/(z2+a2)1/2] . You can see that E is not defined when r = 0.

You can learn more here: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elelin.html

As for Ampere's law, it works fine for a current carrying wire. ∮B·dS = μ0I. For magnetic field inside the wire, you just need to divide the current by relative surface area. So when you are at the exact center, I = 0 and B = 0.
 
eifphysics said:
I am not an expert on this, but I will give your my thought. First, I think you need to specify that by finite wire, it means a finite line charge distribution(usually uniform, as the integral is easier to work with), not a current-carrying wire. Because there is hardly any electric field around a current-carrying wire, even though there is magnetic field around it. Then by exact center, do you mean at the central point of the wire? If so, then there is no electric field defined here, because we treat charges as concrete point without structure when we considering the problem. Mathematically, electric field vertical distance z away from the wire is given by E = kλ/z·[b/(z2+b2)1/2+a/(z2+a2)1/2] . You can see that E is not defined when r = 0.

You can learn more here: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elelin.html

As for Ampere's law, it works fine for a current carrying wire. ∮B·dS = μ0I. For magnetic field inside the wire, you just need to divide the current by relative surface area. So when you are at the exact center, I = 0 and B = 0.

For the Gauss's law case, I am talking about a wire with a uniform charge density lambda, as you say. And I am talking about finding the field a distance $z$ radially away from the midpoint of the wire. This is defined and easily calculable $\int_{-l/2}^{l/2} \lambda z dx/(x^2+z^2)^{3/2}$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K