I Integral in a variational principle problem

MrMuscle
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Trying to solve the integral, for variational principle in griffith's book.
But I'm stuck at the final step. Can you please help?
Hi, I am trying to solve the problem in Griffith's book about variational principle. However, I am having trouble to solve the integral by myself that I have indicated in redbox in Griffith's book. You can see my effort in hand-written pages. I brought it to the final step I believe, but can't go further. A little bit help to finish the integration would do great! Thanks for your help in advance!
answer.JPG

QUESTION.JPG
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MrMuscle said:
Summary: Trying to solve the integral, for variational principle in griffith's book.
But I'm stuck at the final step. Can you please help?

Hi, I am trying to solve the problem in Griffith's book about variational principle. However, I am having trouble to solve the integral by myself that I have indicated in redbox in Griffith's book. You can see my effort in hand-written pages. I brought it to the final step I believe, but can't go further. A little bit help to finish the integration would do great! Thanks for your help in advance!
View attachment 253010
View attachment 253009
You could make ##e^{-2bx^2}## look like a Gaussian zero-mean probability density function and use known results for the area under the curve and the variance.
 
MrMuscle said:
Summary: Trying to solve the integral, for variational principle in griffith's book.
But I'm stuck at the final step. Can you please help?

Hi, I am trying to solve the problem in Griffith's book about variational principle. However, I am having trouble to solve the integral by myself that I have indicated in redbox in Griffith's book. You can see my effort in hand-written pages. I brought it to the final step I believe, but can't go further. A little bit help to finish the integration would do great! Thanks for your help in advance!
View attachment 253010
View attachment 253009
If you look inside the back cover of the Griffiths book you might find those standard integrals.

If you want to derive them yourself, the first can be done by a clever trick and transforming to polar coordinates; and the second can be reduced to the first using integration by parts.

PS I'm not sure how you got so far in the book without doing those integrals about 20 times already!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top