Integral Q: s(x)<=f(x)<=t(x), Equal Areas?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Miike012
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
Miike012
Messages
1,009
Reaction score
0
I am confused on what the paragraph is saying which is copied onto the paint document...
I think it is saying that the graph, which I added to the paint document, has two
Integrable function s(x) and t(x) in which s(x) <= f(x) <= t(x). If the rectangles that I highlighted in green and orange have equal areas then f(x) whose area is surrounded by these rectanels must be integrable because ∫s(x)dx = ∫t(x)dx on [a,b] . how far off am I?
 

Attachments

  • MMM.jpg
    MMM.jpg
    21.1 KB · Views: 455
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're close, but not entirely there.

Remember that we used to calculate the area under a graph by drawing little rectangles below it? This is the generalisation of that procedure.

Note that it is only talking about step functions, i.e. functions of the form
[tex]s(x) = \begin{cases} c_0 & x \in [a_0, b_0], \\ c_1 & x \in [a_1, b_1], \\ \vdots & \vdots \\ c_n & x \in [a_n, b_n] \end{cases}[/tex]

The idea is, we define the integral of such a function, as
[tex]\int_{a_0}^{b_n} s(x) \, dx = \sum_{i = 0}^n c_i (b_i - a_i)[/tex]
Then we define the lower and upper Riemann sums of f as
[tex]I_{a}^{b}(f) = \sup_{s \le f} \int_a^b s(x) \, dx[/tex]
and
[tex]J_{a}^{b}(f) = \inf_{s \ge f} \int_a^b s(x) \, dx[/tex]
respectively. This is bascially a approximation with rectangles of the function f.

Now you have a sequence of inequalities like [itex]a \le I \le J \le d[/itex], and the second part of the theorem basically says that if a = d, then I = J.
In that case, we call I = J the integral of f, denoted by the familiar notation, and we call it integrable.

So we basically extend the "simple" intuitive definition to (almost) arbitrary functions.
 
CompuChip said:
Remember that we used to calculate the area under a graph by drawing little rectangles below it? This is the generalisation of that procedure.

Note that it is only talking about step functions, i.e. functions of the form
[tex]s(x) = \begin{cases} c_0 & x \in [a_0, b_0], \\ c_1 & x \in [a_1, b_1], \\ \vdots & \vdots \\ c_n & x \in [a_n, b_n] \end{cases}[/tex]

Is that what you meant to write?
 
Oops, of course I meant them to be continuous and open intervals, good catch!

[tex]s(x) = \begin{cases} c_0 & x \in )a_0, a_1), \\ c_1 & x \in (a_1, a_2), \\ \vdots & \vdots \\ c_n & x \in (a_n, a_{n + 1}) \end{cases}[/tex]