Integrals and dirac delta function

Click For Summary
The integral discussed is ∫ f(q+T)δ(t-q)dq with boundaries from -∞ to +∞. The Dirac delta function samples the function f at the point where t equals q, leading to the conclusion that the integral evaluates to f(t+T). There is some confusion regarding the variables q and t, but the analysis confirms that the delta function shifts the argument of f. Additionally, participants share tips on using LaTeX for better formatting in discussions. The conversation emphasizes understanding the properties of the Dirac delta function in integration.
EvLer
Messages
454
Reaction score
0
hello again,
i have an integral to solve and not sure how to approach this:

\int f(q+T)\delta (t-q)dq

and the boundaries of integral are -inf +inf couldn't figure it out with latex.
what I know about this is that if delta function is integrated like this, it would be just the value of the function f(q) at some point. What bothers me is that f(q) is shifted to the right and I am not sure where the dirac delta function samples f(q). actually, I think I'm sort of confused...with all the variables in there q and t??
Any help is very much appreciated.

edit: my best estimation of the solution to this is f(t+T)?
not sure if that's correct, but \delta (-t) = \delta (t), so \delta (t-q) = \delta (q-t) which means that the integral = f(q + T) evaluated at q = t, i.e. value of f(t + T)? :confused:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You got it right, and your analysis is correct.

Carl
 
EvLer said:
hello again,
i have an integral to solve and not sure how to approach this:

\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} f(q+T)\delta (t-q)dq

and the boundaries of integral are -inf +inf couldn't figure it out with latex.
... :confused:
You mean, like this :smile:
 
Thanks for checking my work and ... um... Latex (i still don't know how to do that, will have to read tutorials in Physics section).
 
EvLer said:
Thanks for checking my work and ... um... Latex (i still don't know how to do that, will have to read tutorials in Physics section).
If you click on the "quote" button at the bottom of my post, you can see the latex code I used. Or, the latex code anyone else has used.

For yourself, or for anyone esle reading, you can do subscripts and superscripts with the undescore (_) and carat (^) characters.
For example, x^2 becomes x^2 and x_2 becomes x_2.

The underscore and carat characters always operate on the next "object" following them. The object can be a single character or it can be a group of characters if they are enclosed within curly brackets - {}.
So,
\int_2^3 will give \int_2^3 while \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} gives \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K