Double Integral with Dirac Delta Function and Changing Limits

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating a double integral involving a Dirac delta function and the hyperbolic sine function. Participants explore various approaches to handle the integral, particularly focusing on the implications of the delta function and the limits of integration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the integral and seeks guidance on how to evaluate it, noting the presence of the delta function.
  • Some participants suggest integrating the hyperbolic sine function and express confusion about the role of the delta function in the integral.
  • There are discussions about the conditions under which the delta function is non-zero, particularly regarding the relationship between the parameters a, q, and s.
  • Several participants propose splitting the integral based on the value of q relative to a, indicating that this could clarify the evaluation process.
  • One participant argues that if q, s, and a are all negative, the delta function would always be zero, while another challenges this assertion.
  • There is a suggestion to change the variable in the integral to facilitate evaluation, with some participants expressing skepticism about the correctness of proposed solutions.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying the ranges for the parameters involved in the integral.
  • Some participants express frustration with the responses received, indicating a lack of consensus on the best approach to take.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the evaluation of the integral. Multiple competing views and approaches are presented, with ongoing debate about the implications of the delta function and the correct handling of the integral limits.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the assumptions about the parameters a, q, and s, particularly their ranges and how they affect the evaluation of the integral. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of the delta function's behavior in the context of the given integral.

hunt_mat
Homework Helper
Messages
1,816
Reaction score
33
TL;DR
Double integral as a result of some work I'm doing
I have an integral:
<br /> \int_{-1}^{0}\int_{-1}^{q}\delta(s+a)\sinh[k(q-s)]dsdq<br />
where 0&lt;a&lt;1 and \delta (s-a) is a dirac delta function. Anyone know what to do?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: HallsofIvy
Physics news on Phys.org
You could try integrating the ##\sinh## function!

What's the difficulty?
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: hunt_mat
The delta function perhaps? I get it that it's a complicated integral.
 
What does the delta function do when you integrate over s?
 
hunt_mat said:
The delta function perhaps? I get it that it's a complicated integral.
Okay, there's a ##q## in the integration bounds. I didn't see that.

Try looking at the cases ##q < a## and ##q > a##.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
What does the delta function do when you integrate over s?
You don't know a priori if a\in(-1,q], that's the crux of the problem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
hunt_mat said:
You don't know a priori if a\in(-1,q]\, that's the crux of the problem.
Split the integral. Then you do know.

##a \in [-1, q]## when ##q > a##.
 
  • Like
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50 and hunt_mat
PeroK said:
Okay, there's a ##q## in the integration bounds. I didn't see that.

Try looking at the cases ##q < a## and ##q > a##.
How's that going to help when you have another integral to do. I was thinking that at one point a would be in the integration range, so you can simply write:
<br /> \int_{-1}^{0}\int_{-1}^{q}\delta (s+a)\sinh[k(q-s)]dsdq=\int_{-1}^{0}\sinh[k(q+a)]=\frac{1}{k}(\cosh(ka)-\cosh[k(a-1)]) <br />
This seems like a sloppy way of arguing however.
 
hunt_mat said:
How's that going to help when you have another integral to do. I was thinking that at one point a would be in the integration range, so you can simply write:
<br /> \int_{-1}^{0}\int_{-1}^{q}\delta (s+a)\sinh[k(q-s)]dsdq=\int_{-1}^{0}\sinh[k(q+a)]=\frac{1}{k}(\cosh(ka)-\cosh[k(a-1)]) <br />
This seems like a sloppy way of arguing however.
That doesn't look right. You can split the outer integral in ##dq##.
 
  • #10
Ps you've got ##\delta(s + a)## in your integral. I assume it should be ##\delta(s -a)##.
 
  • #11
PeroK said:
Ps you've got ##\delta(s + a)## in your integral. I assume it should be ##\delta(s -a)##.
You assume wrong. If you look at the interval and the range a can take, then you'll see where you mistake is.
 
  • #12
PeroK said:
That doesn't look right. You can split the outer integral in ##dq##.
How is that going to help? a\in (-1,0) and so it's going to be in there no matter what.
 
  • #13
hunt_mat said:
How is that going to help? a\in (-1,0) and so it's going to be in there no matter what.
Did you come for help or simply to reject any help you are offered?
 
  • #14
hunt_mat said:
You assume wrong. If you look at the interval and the range a can take, then you'll see where you mistake is.

If ##q, s, a## are all negative then ##\delta(s+a)## is always ##0##.
 
  • #15
hunt_mat said:
Summary: Double integral as a result of some work I'm doing

I have an integral:
<br /> \int_{-1}^{0}\int_{-1}^{q}\delta(s+a)\sinh[k(q-s)]dsdq<br />
where -1&lt;a&lt;0 and \delta (s-a) is a dirac delta function. Anyone know what to do?
Note that you have both ##s +a## and ##s-a## in this post.
 
  • #16
PeroK said:
Did you come for help or simply to reject any help you are offered?
No. I'm just questioning your answers. It's an involved integral. I don't have access to a symbolic algebra program. I gave the best thought I had, you rejected that without much justification. I'm open to suggestions, but I do have questions.
 
  • #17
PeroK said:
Note that you have both ##s +a## and ##s-a## in this post.
I wanted to point out that it was a delta function.
 
  • #18
hunt_mat said:
No. I'm just questioning your answers. It's an involved integral. I don't have access to a symbolic algebra program. I gave the best thought I had, you rejected that without much justification. I'm open to suggestions, but I do have questions.
##\int_{-1}^0 dq = \int_{-1}^a dq + \int_a^0 dq##

The first integral vanishes as ##s## is in the range ##[-1, q]## which does not include ##a##.

For the second integral tge range of ##s## always includes ##a##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
  • #19
PeroK said:
If ##q, s, a## are all negative then ##\delta(s+a)## is always ##0##.
I don't think so.
 
  • #20
PeroK said:
##\int_{-1}^0 dq = \int_{-1}^a dq + \int_a^0 dq##

The first integral vanishes as ##s## is in the range ##[-1, q]## which does not include ##a##.

For the second integral tge range of ##s## always includes ##a##.
I don't understand why this is relevant.
 
  • #21
hunt_mat said:
I don't think so.
Why not? ##\delta(x) =0## except when ##x=0##. You can't get zero by adding two negative numbers. But, you can by subtracting them.
 
  • #22
##\frac 1 k (\cosh(ka)-1)##
Go figure.
 
  • #23
I see where you're confused. Having thought about it a\in(0,1) which is confusing things.
 
  • #24
hunt_mat said:
I see where you're confused. Having thought about it a\in(0,1) which is confusing things.
You see where I'm confused! That's a bit rich!

It's your post. If ##a## should be positive and you stated it was negative that's your confusion. Not mine.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DEvens and Vanadium 50
  • #25
If you split up the inner integral as:
<br /> \int_{-1}^{q}=\int_{-1}^{a-\varepsilon}+\int_{a-\varepsilon}^{a+\varepsilon}+\int_{a+\varepsilon}^{q}<br />
Then you're going to get the function I posted. Splitting up the outer integral isn't going to do much in my opinion.
 
  • #26
PeroK said:
##\frac 1 k (\cosh(ka)-1)##
Go figure.
This solution doesn't look right to me.
 
  • #27
hunt_mat said:
This solution doesn't look right to me.
I figured as much. DIY
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: hunt_mat
  • #28
PeroK said:
I figured as much. DIY
I did, or what I thought looked sensible. My solution doesn't look right to you, and yours doesn't look right to me.
 
  • #29
Thank you for your help thought PeroK.
 
  • #30
This has been painful to watch. PeroK has been giving excellent advice.

  • First, split the integral into two pieces, one where the delta function is zero everywhere and one where it is not.
  • Do the inner integral. The first part (above) is zero and the second part (above) sets s = -a. The only q left should be inside the sinh.
  • Set a new variable r = q + a. Set you limits in terms of r.
  • Do the outer (and only remaining) integral. I believe you will have only one a left.
 
  • Skeptical
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hunt_mat and PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K