Integral's Results Challenge Quantum Theory: GR vs. QM

In summary, the ESA's Integral gamma-ray observatory has found that space must be grainy at much smaller scales than previously predicted, based on results that affect the search for physics beyond Einstein. This goes against Einstein's General Theory of Relativity which assumes that space is a smooth, continuous fabric. This could potentially hinder many quantum mechanics theories, as it suggests that Planck's length may not be the smallest length and our understanding of QM may be incorrect. There is ongoing discussion and debate about the implications of these findings.
  • #1
eiyaz
41
0
http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEM5B34TBPG_index_0.html

"ESA’s Integral gamma-ray observatory has provided results that will dramatically affect the search for physics beyond Einstein. It has shown that any underlying quantum ‘graininess’ of space must be at much smaller scales than previously predicted.

Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity describes the properties of gravity and assumes that space is a smooth, continuous fabric. Yet quantum theory suggests that space should be grainy at the smallest scales, like sand on a beach."


According to the article since QM implies that space-time is actually distorted at small lengths especially near the Planck length of 10^-35, the lack of distortion could hinger many QM theories.

I am going to make a bold statement, please correct me if I am wrong. The article states that no distortion was found down to 10^-48. Since Planck's length is only 10^-35 how is this even possible? Does this mean Planck length is not the smallest length, thereby suggesting that a large part of QM is incorrect?

GR states that space-time is essentially smooth while QM suggests that space is distorted at the micro level. If the distortion is less than Planck's length, would this not mean there is no distortion, thus disproving everything we know about QM?

I hope I'm not looking at this correctly!
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Related to Integral's Results Challenge Quantum Theory: GR vs. QM

1. What is the Integral's Results Challenge Quantum Theory?

The Integral's Results Challenge Quantum Theory is a scientific competition that aims to test the validity of two competing theories in physics: General Relativity (GR) and Quantum Mechanics (QM). It involves analyzing data from the European Space Agency's Integral satellite and comparing it to predictions made by both theories.

2. How does this challenge contribute to our understanding of physics?

This challenge allows for a direct comparison between GR and QM, which are two of the most fundamental theories in physics. By analyzing the data and determining which theory provides a better explanation, we can gain a deeper understanding of the laws that govern our universe.

3. What is the significance of using data from the Integral satellite?

The Integral satellite is specifically designed to study gamma-ray emissions, which are a crucial aspect of many astronomical phenomena. This makes it a highly valuable source of data for testing theories in physics, as it provides a unique perspective on the universe.

4. Who can participate in the Integral's Results Challenge Quantum Theory?

The challenge is open to all scientists and researchers who are interested in the field of physics. However, participants must have a strong background in both GR and QM theories, as well as experience in data analysis and interpretation.

5. What are the potential outcomes of this challenge?

There are two possible outcomes of the challenge: either GR will be found to be a more accurate theory than QM, or QM will be proven to be a better explanation of the observed data. Both outcomes would have significant implications for our understanding of physics and could potentially lead to new advancements in the field.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
8
Replies
264
Views
16K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
69
Views
5K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
16
Views
11K
Back
Top