Integrate 1/z^2 Over a Closed Curve

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral of the function \( \frac{1}{z^2} \) over a closed curve that contains the origin is evaluated using Cauchy's Integral Theorem and Cauchy's Integral Formula. The discussion clarifies that while \( f(z) = \frac{1}{z} \) is not analytic at the origin, the generalized Cauchy's Integral Formula can be applied with \( f(z) = 1 \), leading to the conclusion that the integral evaluates to \( 0 \). The correct approach involves transforming the integral around the unit circle and utilizing the substitution \( z = e^{it} \) to convert it into a real integral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex analysis concepts, specifically Cauchy's Integral Theorem and Cauchy's Integral Formula.
  • Familiarity with contour integration techniques in complex analysis.
  • Knowledge of analytic functions and their properties.
  • Ability to perform substitutions in integrals, particularly in the context of complex variables.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Cauchy's Integral Theorem in various complex functions.
  • Learn about the generalized Cauchy's Integral Formula and its implications for different functions.
  • Explore contour integration techniques, focusing on transformations and substitutions.
  • Investigate the properties of analytic functions and their singularities in complex analysis.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those specializing in complex analysis, as well as anyone looking to deepen their understanding of contour integration and Cauchy's theorems.

Poopsilon
Messages
288
Reaction score
1
\int_\alpha\frac{1}{z^2}dz

I can't figure out how to integrate this over a closed circle which contains the origin on its interior. I'm assuming it is equal to 2πi; is there a way to apply Cauchy's Integral Theorem? If I set f(z)=1/z then that is not analytic on the interior, so I don't see how I can apply the theorem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
oops I mean't cauchy's integral theorem. But that theorem would require that f(z)=1/z by analytic at zero.
 
Poopsilon said:
oops I mean't cauchy's integral theorem. But that theorem would require that f(z)=1/z by analytic at zero.

Yeah, you can't use that theorem here...
 
oops shoot I meant cauchys integral formula! sorry about that lol. How can I use that? Would f(z) just equal 1?

Edit: Ah wait so I could use the generalized formula with f(z)=1 and get 2πi, is that right?

Super Duper Edit: But wait I'm sorry that would give me 0 because the derivative of a constant function is 0, but I'm quite sure it should be 2πi, so something's wrong.
 
Last edited:
It's not 2pi*i. It's 0. Do what you did in the other thread and integrate around the unit circle and put z=exp(it). Change it to an integral dt. Use the cauchy integral theorem on the difference between the unit circle and the contour alpha.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K