Integrate this equation by parts

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xetman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrate parts
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the integration of the function e^t * t dt using integration by parts. The correct method involves setting u = t and dv = e^t dt, leading to the solution uv - ∫v du = t e^t - ∫e^t dt = t e^t - e^t + C. The alternative method proposed by a participant, where u = e^t and dv = t dt, complicates the integral unnecessarily. Key insights include the importance of choosing the right terms to differentiate and integrate to simplify the integral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integration by parts
  • Familiarity with basic calculus concepts
  • Knowledge of exponential functions and their properties
  • Ability to manipulate integrals and derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Practice integration by parts with different functions
  • Learn about the reduction formulas for integrals involving polynomials and exponentials
  • Explore the concept of choosing u and dv effectively in integration problems
  • Study advanced integration techniques such as integration by substitution and trigonometric integrals
USEFUL FOR

Students learning calculus, particularly those studying integration techniques, as well as educators seeking to explain integration by parts effectively.

Xetman
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Integrate ettdt using integration by parts.2. The attempt at a solution

Seems like a very easy problem; however, I just started learning integration by parts-- didn't understand this.

So the book's method:

u=t dv=etdt
du=dt v= et

uv-∫vdu=tet-∫etdt=tet-et+C.My method:

u=et dv=tdt
du=etdt v=t2/2uv-∫vdu=ett2/2-∫(t2/2)etdt

My method seems wrong, so can anyone please answer me why my method won't work?
Is it just about assigning the correct values to the correct variables?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your method is not wrong, but it is not helpful. Integration by parts offers several options. We want to replace our integral by a simpler one. Your integral is more complicated. ∫te^t dt can be traded for ∫t^2 e^t dt or ∫e^t dt, the former is worse the latter better. As you practice you will see what choice improves the situation and what does not.
 
lurflurf said:
∫te^t dt can be traded for ∫t^2 e^t dt or ∫e^t dt, the former is worse the latter better.

can you please explain how ? I'm confused..
 
Hi MrWarlock616! :smile:

tet is in two parts, t and et

you can push et up, and t down …

then et stays as et, and t becomes 1, then 0​

of you can push et down, and t up …

then et stays as et, and t becomes t2/2, then t3/6, then …​

the idea is to push in the direction that makes one of them disappear :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi MrWarlock616! :smile:

tet is in two parts, t and et

you can push et up, and t down …

then et stays as et, and t becomes 1, then 0​

of you can push et down, and t up …

then et stays as et, and t becomes t2/2, then t3/6, then …​

the idea is to push in the direction that makes one of them disappear :wink:
This must a new concept. I'm not familiar with the push up and down..but thanks!
 
The thing to keep in mind is that for elementary integration by parts problems, the tricky term is the integral one is left with. From the original integrand (which is the product of two terms), one term gets differentiated, while the other term gets integrated. Do that in your head, and if the product between the two resulting terms can now be integrated again more easily, then it's the right approach.

Writing it out makes it seem more complicated than it is! :biggrin:
 
MrWarlock616 said:
This must a new concept. I'm not familiar with the push up and down..but thanks!

The pushing "up and down" means "integrating and differentiating," respectively. I imagine tiny_tim was thinking of "pushing down" the degree of the "t" part of the original integrand, and the resulting integral (the v du part) would simply be et, as opposed to the one you got using your method.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K