Integrating 3cos[SUP]5[/SUP]3xdx

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobsmith76
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrating
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the integration of trigonometric functions, specifically comparing the integration of sin4(3x)cos(3x) to 3cos5(3x)dx. The correct integration of sin4(3x) results in (1/5)sin5(3x), while the proposed integration of 3cos5(3x) into (cos6(3x)/2) is incorrect. The necessity of using the chain rule and understanding foundational algebra and trigonometry concepts is emphasized for successful problem-solving in calculus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of trigonometric identities and functions
  • Knowledge of integration techniques, including the chain rule
  • Familiarity with the power rule of differentiation
  • Basic algebra skills for manipulating expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study integration techniques involving trigonometric functions
  • Learn about the chain rule in calculus
  • Review algebraic manipulation of trigonometric identities
  • Practice problems involving the integration of composite functions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those struggling with integration of trigonometric functions, as well as educators seeking to reinforce foundational math concepts in their teaching.

bobsmith76
Messages
336
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Screenshot2012-02-10at63230PM.png


If you look at the answer you will see that they integrate sin43x into (sin53x)/5. well, if you can do that why not just integrate 3cos53xdx into (cos63xdx)/2? why go through all the trouble of dividing it into parts? it is true that (cos63xdx)/2 = 0 but i still don't see why you can integrate sin43x and not 3cos53xdx.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bobsmith76 said:

Homework Statement



Screenshot2012-02-10at63230PM.png


If you look at the answer you will see that they integrate sin43x into (sin53x)/5.
No, they do not. They integrate sin4(3x)*cos(3x)*3dx[/color] to get (1/5)sin5(3x).
bobsmith76 said:
well, if you can do that why not just integrate 3cos53xdx into (cos63xdx)/2?
Because that's not the right answer. IOW, (cos63xdx)/2 is not an antiderivative of 3cos53x.
bobsmith76 said:
why go through all the trouble of dividing it into parts?
To make a relatively difficult problem amenable to solution by a very simple technique. Do you recognize what type of integration they did for the 2nd and 3rd integrals? I'm guessing you don't.
bobsmith76 said:
it is true that (cos63xdx)/2 = 0
?
No, this is not generally true.
bobsmith76 said:
but i still don't see why you can integrate sin43x and not 3cos53xdx.
 
They don't integrate sin43x into sin53x/5 but rather, they integrate sin43xcos3x into sin53x/5.

Thinking about sin53x/5 this makes sense as if you were to differentiate that function you would get nfn-1 per the power rule which is sin43x times the derivative of the inner function per the chain rule, cos3x.

You couldn't integrate 3cos53xdx into (cos63xdx)/2 as you would need a -sin3x with it so as to fullfil the chain rule.

I hope that I'm not totally wrong on this and if not, that it helps you understand.
 
Bob, I have to question the reasonableness of your study strategy. I've read your blog, so I understand a little of your situation and what you're trying to do, which is laudable. However, mathematics is not something that is amenable to cramming X number of pages into Y hours of study time. You will not learn very well by merely looking at worked problems and trying to understand the steps they show. You'll learn better by actually working the problems - then things will stick in your mind.

Also, in a fair number of your posts, I've noticed a lack of understanding of basic algebra and trig concepts. You will continue beating your head against the wall, unless you revisit those parts of mathematics and reinforce these foundational subjects.

Unlike some other disciplines, mathematics is not made up of discrete, unrelated areas, but instead builds on previous areas. The old saying is, if you build your house on sand, it will collapse.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K