Integrating cos^2(x) using two methods: substitution and integration by parts

  • Thread starter Thread starter henryc09
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating the integral of cos²(x) using two different methods. The subject area is calculus, specifically focusing on integration techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of substitution with the identity cos²(x) = (1 + cos(2x))/2. There is uncertainty about the effectiveness of integration by parts and whether it can be applied in this context. One participant suggests exploring the Pythagorean identity cos²(x) + sin²(x) = 1 as a potential avenue.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes attempts to clarify the methods for integrating cos²(x). Some participants express confusion about the application of integration by parts, while others indicate that it can be used effectively with the right approach. There is a sense of progress as one participant reports understanding after receiving input.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the need to use trigonometric identities effectively, and some participants are exploring the limitations of their current methods. The original poster seeks two distinct methods for the integration task.

henryc09
Messages
68
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1. Evaluate:
[tex]\oint cos^2(x)dx[/tex]

Using two different methods


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I have done it making the substitution of cos^2(x) = (1 + cos(2x))/2 but don't see how you can do this another way. Integration by parts doesn't seem to work and nor does substitution as far as I'm aware. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could maybe do something with this:

[tex]cos^2(x) + sin^2(x) = 1[/tex]
 
henryc09 said:
I have done it making the substitution of cos^2(x) = (1 + cos(2x))/2 but don't see how you can do this another way. Integration by parts doesn't seem to work and nor does substitution as far as I'm aware. Any ideas?

Integration by parts does indeed work on this integral, you just have to know where to use your trig identities as Seannation was hinting at.
 
Ah ok I've got it now, thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K