Integrating Exponential Functions Multiplied by t^n

Click For Summary
Integrating exponential functions multiplied by powers of t, such as t^n * exp(-t), always converges to a finite value when evaluated from t0 to infinity. This is due to the exponential decay outpacing the polynomial growth of t^n. The integral can be proven finite through induction and integration by parts, with the result being that ∫_0^∞ t^n e^(-t) dt equals n!. The left summand approaches zero, while the right integral converges, confirming the convergence for all n. The discussion also highlights the ability to interchange sums and integrals for power series involving these functions.
Cyrus
Messages
3,237
Reaction score
17
Its true that if you integrate an exponential function from some time t0 to infinity it will converge to a finite value.

However, is the same true if it is multiplied by say t, t^2, t^3,t^n.


i.e. t*exp(-t) for example.

the exp is decaying to zero faaster than t is, so it goes to zero in the limit. But there are functions that decay to zero but their integral is not finite because the rate of decay is not *fast enough*.

Would the integral of exp multiplied by any power of t ALWAYs converge to a finite number?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes.

\int_{t_0}^\infty t^n e^{-t} dt

is always finite. You can prove this by induction (hint: use integration by parts).

Here's an interesting factoid for you:

\int_0^\infty t^n e^{-t} dt = n!.
 
Yes, using an integration by parts to get an inductive argument. Integrating t*exp(-t) for example will get you

<br /> -te^{-t} + \int_{t_0}^\infty e^{-t} dt<br />

The left summand will go to 0 and the right integral converges. That establishes that the indefinite integral of t*exp(-t) converges, then since the derivative t^2 is 2t you can establish it again with t^2 and so on (the left summand, t^n*exp(-t) will always go to 0 since t^n = o(e^t) for all n).

Edit: oops, morphism already answered.
 
Also consider what happens when you integrate the power series.

t^n*exp(-t) is sufficiently nice that you should be able to interchange the sum and integral.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
14K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K