Integrating factor vs. Laplace. Engineering problems

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on solving a differential equation related to mass balances in mixing tanks using two methods: integrating factor and Laplace transform. The integrating factor method is preferred for its simplicity in handling the given equation, while the Laplace transform is seen as more suitable for complex equations despite being perceived as overkill for simpler cases. Participants agree that both methods yield the same solution, but the integrating factor method is favored for its elegance and ease of use. The final solution for the concentration of salt in the tank is provided, emphasizing the effectiveness of the integrating factor approach. Ultimately, the choice of method depends on the complexity of the differential equation being solved.

Preferred solving method

  • Laplace transform

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    3
MexChemE
Messages
237
Reaction score
54
Hello PF! We were doing mass balances on mixing tanks in one of my ChemE courses, and in one of the problems we arrived at the following DE:
\frac{dC_B}{d \theta} + 0.025C_B=0.0125 e^{-0.025 \theta}
Where CB is the concetration of salt in the tank and θ is time. The professor made us solve the equation using two methods, integrating factor and Laplace transform, and told us to keep working on following problems with the method of our choice. Personally, I preferred using the integrating factor method, because it is a very simple equation, and I don't like to be dealing with transform charts while solving problems, although I know that for more complex DEs the integrating factor method becomes really complicated, and Laplace transform remains relatively simpler. I think I'll be using integrating factor for simple equations like this, and LT for more complex differential equations, although I'm more inclined to use the integrating factor method. Also, which method do you think looks more elegant? Even though I'm an engineering student I always try to be "mathematically elegant," whenever it is possible. By the way, the solution of the equation is:
C_B= (0.0125 \theta +0.25) e^{-0.025 \theta}
So, long story short, integrating factor or Laplace transform? Why? Which method do you think is more elegant?

Thanks in advance for any input!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In my opinion, while both would give you the same solution. for your specific equation, I'd use the integrating factor method.

Mainly because I'd think the Laplace transform is kind of overkill for simple DEs.
 
  • Like
Likes LAZYANGEL and MexChemE
Integrating factor sounds way easier, because the integrating factor eliminates the exponential on the right hand side which is fantastic.

##\mu (x)=e^{\int 0.025 \: d\theta}=e^{0.025 \theta}##

And when you multiply both sides by the integrating factor, you get:

## \frac{d}{d \theta} \left [ C_B \cdot e^{0.025\theta} \right ] = 0.0125##

##\int \frac{d}{d \theta} \left [ C_B \cdot e^{0.025\theta} \right ] \: d \theta =\int 0.0125 \: d \theta##

##C_B \cdot e^{0.025\theta}=0.0125 \theta + c_1##

##C_B=e^{-0.025\theta}\left ( 0.0125 \theta + c_1 \right )##
 
  • Like
Likes MexChemE

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K