High School Integration by Parts, an introduction I get confused with

Click For Summary
Integration by parts is derived from the Product Rule for differentiation, leading to the formula ∫UdV = UV - ∫VdU. An example using this method is ∫xe^xdx, where U is set to x and dV to e^xdx, resulting in the solution xe^x - e^x + C. The discussion also touches on the use of constants of integration, clarifying that while K is commonly used, any letter can serve as a constant, though some symbols may be inappropriate in certain contexts. The importance of not including a constant of integration with V until the final evaluation is emphasized. This method and its nuances are essential for mastering integration techniques.
mcastillo356
Gold Member
Messages
644
Reaction score
352
TL;DR
The theoretical part is no problem. I also understand the following example; but at the next paragraphs, I've got a naive question I want to share with the forum.
Hi, PF

Integration by parts is pointed out this way:

Suppose that ##U(x)## and ##V(x)## are two differentiable functions. According to the Product Rule,

$$\displaystyle\frac{d}{dx}\big(U(x)V(x)\big)=U(x)\displaystyle\frac{dV}{dx}+V(x)\displaystyle\frac{dU}{dx}$$

Integrating both sides of this equation and transposing terms, we obtain

$$\displaystyle\int{\,U(x)\displaystyle\frac{dV}{dx}dx}=U(x)V(x)-\displaystyle\int{\,V(x)\displaystyle\frac{dU}{dx}dx}$$

or, more simply,

$$\displaystyle\int{\,UdV}=UV-\displaystyle\int{\,VdU}$$

(...)

EXAMPLE 1 ##\displaystyle\int{\,xe^{x}dx}## Let ##U=x##, ##dV=e^{x}dx##.
Then ##dU=dx, V=e^{x}##.
##=xe^{x}-\displaystyle\int{\,e^{x}dx} (i.e., UV-\int{\,VdU}##
##=xe^{x}-e^{x}+C##

Note also that had we included a constant of integration with V, for example, V=e^{x}+K, that constant would cancel out in the next step:

##\displaystyle\int{\,xe^{x}dx}=x(e^{x}+K)-\displaystyle\int{(e^{x}+K)dx}##
$$=xe^{x}+Kx-e^{x}-Kx+C=xe^{x}-e^{x}+C$$

In general, do not include a constant of integration with ##V## or on the right-hand side until the last integral has been evaluated

Question: it is the appearance of ##K## to express a constant of integration:

(i) Could it have been any other letter of the alphabet?
(ii) Mention ##C'## could have been misleading?

Greetings!

Attempt
(i) It wouldn't have been appropiate neither the Greek alphabet, ment for linear equationts, physics notations (for example ##\Omega## stands for electrical resistance), nor non Latin not capital letters etc,
(ii) ##C'=0##
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You may use any alphabet including Greece you like. With suffices
C_1,C_2,C_3,… works also.
 
  • Informative
Likes e_jane and mcastillo356
Hi, @anuttarasammyak, brilliant.
anuttarasammyak said:
You may use any alphabet including Greece you like. With suffices
C_1,C_2,C_3,… works also.
Thanks a lot
 
There are probably loads of proofs of this online, but I do not want to cheat. Here is my attempt: Convexity says that $$f(\lambda a + (1-\lambda)b) \leq \lambda f(a) + (1-\lambda) f(b)$$ $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (f(a) - f(b))$$ We know from the intermediate value theorem that there exists a ##c \in (b,a)## such that $$\frac{f(a) - f(b)}{a-b} = f'(c).$$ Hence $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (a - b) f'(c))$$ $$\frac{f(b + \lambda(a-b)) - f(b)}{\lambda(a-b)}...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K