MHB Integration Formulas: Do We Really Need to Memorize Them?

  • Thread starter Thread starter soroban
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Age
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the necessity of memorizing integration formulas, specifically the formulas for integrals involving rational functions. Participants highlight the efficiency of using memorized formulas, such as \(\int \frac{du}{u^2-a^2} = \frac{1}{2a}\ln\left|\frac{u-a}{u+a}\right| + C\) and \(\int \frac{du}{u^2+a^2} = \frac{1}{a}\arctan(\frac{u}{a}) + C\), over more complex derivations. The preference for direct application of these formulas over lengthy algebraic manipulations is emphasized, particularly in the context of teaching methods for calculus students. The discussion also touches on the importance of understanding the underlying principles of integration rather than relying solely on memorization.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic calculus concepts, including integration and differentiation.
  • Familiarity with integration techniques, particularly for rational functions.
  • Knowledge of logarithmic and arctangent functions and their properties.
  • Ability to perform algebraic manipulations and substitutions in integrals.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of integration formulas for rational functions.
  • Learn about the properties and applications of logarithmic and arctangent functions in calculus.
  • Explore advanced integration techniques, including substitution and partial fractions.
  • Investigate the concept of domain in integration and its implications for definite integrals.
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, educators teaching integration techniques, and anyone looking to improve their efficiency in solving integrals involving rational functions.

soroban
Messages
191
Reaction score
0

I was taught integration formulas like these:

. . \int\frac{du}{u^2-a^2} \;=\;\frac{1}{2a}\ln\left|\frac{u-a}{u+a}\right|+C . **

It took up only one brain cell and it saved me
the bother of Partial Fractions (every time).I was taught: .\int\frac{du}{u^2+a^2} \;=\;\tfrac{1}{a}\arctan(\tfrac{u}{a})+C

So that: .\int\frac{dx}{x^2+9} \;=\;\tfrac{1}{3}\arctan(\tfrac{x}{3})+CBut it seems that everyone nowadays is taught:

. . \int\frac{du}{u^2+1} \;=\;\arctan u + C

So that, if you are not given a "1" in there,
you must do some Olympic-level gymnastics.

\int\frac{dx}{x^2+9} \;=\;\int\frac{dx}{9(\frac{x^2}{9}+1)} \;=\;\tfrac{1}{9}\int\frac{dx}{(\frac{x}{3})^2+1}

Let u = \tfrac{x}{3} \quad\Rightarrow\quad dx \:=\:3\,du

Substitute: .\tfrac{1}{9}\int \frac{3\,du}{u^2+1} \;=\;\tfrac{1}{3}\arctan u + C

Back-substitute: .\tfrac{1}{3}\arctan(\tfrac{x}{3})+CAm I the only one who prefers doing one step
. . instead of eight?~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

**
By the way, if you've memorized that formula,
. . its sister-formula is easily derived.We have: .\int\frac{du}{u^2-a^2} \;=\;\frac{1}{2a}\ln\left|\frac{u-a}{u+a}\right|+C

Multiply by -1: .-1\int\frac{du}{u^2-a^2} \;=\;-\frac{1}{2a}\ln\left|\frac{u-a}{u+a}\right| + C

. . \int\frac{du}{a^2-u^2} \;=\;\frac{1}{2a}\ln\left|\frac{u-a}{u+a}\right|^{-1} + C

. . \int\frac{du}{a^2-u^2} \;=\;\frac{1}{2a}\ln\left|\frac{u+a}{u-a}\right| + C

. . \int\frac{du}{a^2-u^2} \;=\;\frac{1}{2a}\ln\left|\frac{a+u}{a-u}\right| + C
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Silly me! And there I was thinking I played smart from deriving all of the above from

$$\int \frac{dx}{x} = \log(x) + C \tag{*}$$

And some complicated log-arctan relationships!

$(*)$ : Actually, I can show that the integral on the left side is the inverse of $\exp(x)$, by a little functional analysis ;)
 
One of the things about "finding a primitive" (i.e., an indefinite integral) is that it really doesn't matter HOW you do it, integration is not a mechanical process.

Personally, I would observe that:

$\dfrac{d}{du}\left(\dfrac{u-a}{u+a}\right) = \dfrac{(u+a) - (u - a)}{(u+a)^2}$

$=\dfrac{2a}{(u+a)^2}$

so the result follows from the chain rule.

Regarding mathbalarka's observation, he makes a good point but *some* posters in this forum feels this is "too much to handle" for beginning calculus students. He ought to say the inverse is more properly:

$\displaystyle \int_0^x \dfrac{1}{t}\ dt$ for $x > 0$, the integral is undefined if we use an interval containing 0.

(Similar concerns result with any integral that evaluates to some inverse function such as $\log$, we have to check the "domain of integration" to ensure our answer is *consistent*...the absolute value signs are not entirely a safeguard against this).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K