Prove that the integral is equal to ##\pi^2/8##

  • Thread starter Thread starter Meden Agan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definite integral
Click For Summary
The integral $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx$$ is proposed to equal $$\frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ The discussion involves using the representation of the arcsine function and applying Fubini's Theorem to interchange the order of integration, allowing for a transformation of the integral into a double integral. Participants explore various substitutions, including trigonometric substitutions, to simplify the integrand and compute the integral more effectively. The complexity of the integral and the challenge of finding closed-form solutions for the limits of integration are highlighted, with suggestions for further simplification and exploration of the integral's properties.
  • #91
Meden Agan said:
Sad. I can't believe that is the only possible solution to the integral.
If we look at the graphic,

arcsinroot.webp

then we see an almost linear behavior with slope around ##-1## (or so) when we approach ##\alpha=0## and a very strong curvature toward ##\alpha=a## with an infinite slope. So any substitution ##\beta=p(\alpha)## has to depend on where we are. It's not only non-linear, it also has to switch from almost linear to almost a square root. So what could be a proper scaling of ##\alpha,## making the curve integrable?

The origin of that behavior can be seen if we express ##f(\alpha)(f(- \alpha)## in the original variable ##x,##
$$
f(\alpha)f(-\alpha)=\dfrac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}
$$
so maybe this expression is more promising than the trigonometric version.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #92
fresh_42 said:
If we look at the graphic,


then we see an almost linear behavior with slope around ##-1## (or so) when we approach ##\alpha=0## and a very strong curvature toward ##\alpha=a## with an infinite slope. So any substitution ##\beta=p(\alpha)## has to depend on where we are. It's not only non-linear, it also has to switch from almost linear to almost a square root. So what could be a proper scaling of ##\alpha,## making the curve integrable?

The origin of that behavior can be seen if we express ##f(\alpha)(f(- \alpha)## in the original variable ##x,##
$$
f(\alpha)f(-\alpha)=\dfrac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}
$$
so maybe this expression is more promising than the trigonometric version.
I agree. Your ideas are always excellent, but unfortunately there's nothing we can do.
The form in post #86 made me hopeful. But unfortunately nothing came of it.
 
  • #93
@fresh_42 Did you get something new?
If the answer is no, let's go ahead to analyze the solution on MSE.
 
  • #94
Meden Agan said:
@fresh_42 Did you get something new?
If the answer is no, let's go ahead to analyze the solution on MSE.
I found some nice formulas, e.g., with ##y^2=9-16x## we get
$$
\dfrac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}=
\dfrac{1}{32}\dfrac{(y^2+2y-7)(y^2+7)}{y+1}=\dfrac{1}{32}(y+1)(y^2+7)-\dfrac{1}{4}\dfrac{y^2+7}{y+1}
$$
which makes the polynomial much nicer, but I don't see yet how that helps.
 
  • #95
fresh_42 said:
I found some nice formulas, e.g., with ##y^2=9-16x## we get
$$
\dfrac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}=
\dfrac{1}{32}\dfrac{(y^2+2y-7)(y^2+7)}{y+1}=\dfrac{1}{32}(y+1)(y^2+7)-\dfrac{1}{4}\dfrac{y^2+7}{y+1}
$$
which makes the polynomial much nicer, but I don't see yet how that helps.
I don't see how that helps either.
Let me know if you get anything useful, I'm stuck.
 
  • #96
The key is Zacky's post here:
https://math.stackexchange.com/ques...s-left-frac3x3-3x4x2-sqrt2-x2/4891224#4891224

I tried a similar substitution ##u(y)=\dfrac{y^2+7}{y+1}## (or the root of it) and got ##f(\alpha)f(-\alpha)=2^{-5}u'u(y+1)^2## which is similar. However, I have not found a nice way to get rid of the root of ##f(\alpha)f(-\alpha)## since our integral is
$$
I=2\int_0^{\operatorname{arcsin}(1/\sqrt[4]{8})}\int_0^1 \sqrt{\dfrac{f(y)f(-y)}{1-t^2f(y)f(-y)}}\,dt\,dy.
$$
 
  • #97
@Meden Agan can I ask in what class did you get this integral question? I mean what is the course that you are taking? The reason I am asking this id that the integral in question has to do with the topic of integral geometry and geometric probability.
 
  • #98
  • #99
Meden Agan said:
@fresh_42 Did you get something new?
No, I gave it up. I had the feeling that I only shifted the problem from one point of view to another without adding substance. I tried to fight my way through what MSE had to offer, but that wasn't very clear and demanded more work to do, only to understand what they wrote.
 
  • #100
fresh_42 said:
No, I gave it up. I had the feeling that I only shifted the problem from one point of view to another without adding substance. I tried to fight my way through what MSE had to offer, but that wasn't very clear and demanded more work to do, only to understand what they wrote.
@fresh_42 I found a solution to this integral here. Does it convince you?
I can't understand how they derived equation ##(3)## from equation ##(2)##.
 
  • #101
Meden Agan said:
@fresh_42 I found a solution to this integral here. Does it convince you?
I can't understand how they derived equation ##(3)## from equation ##(2)##.
Looks nice at first sight. They say how to do it. Looks like a bit of work to check it. I'll go through it if I have some time. ##\theta'## has been my problem, too.
 
  • #102
fresh_42 said:
Looks nice at first sight. They say how to do it. Looks like a bit of work to check it. I'll go through it if I have some time. ##\theta'## has been my problem, too.
Sure. But if you differentiate ##\Theta(t) = \arcsin \left(\sqrt{E(t)}\right)## with respect to ##t##, you don't obtain the expression for ##\Theta'(t)## given by ##(3)##.
 
  • #103
Meden Agan said:
@fresh_42 I found a solution to this integral here. Does it convince you?
I can't understand how they derived equation ##(3)## from equation ##(2)##.
Sadly, there's no context.
Where did this integral arise?
What motivated the specific change of variables?
What characterizes the class of similar integrals solved by this method?
From what's presented, it seems it's "guess and check".
 
  • #104
robphy said:
Sadly, there's no context.
Where did this integral arise?
What motivated the specific change of variables?
What characterizes the class of similar integrals solved by this method?
From what's presented, it seems it's "guess and check".
See post #26.
 
  • #105
Meden Agan said:
Sure. But if you differentiate ##\Theta(t) = \arcsin \left(\sqrt{E(t)}\right)## with respect to ##t##, you don't obtain the expression for ##\Theta'(t)## given by ##(3)##.
And if you do what he wrote, you won't obtain it either. ##(2)## results in a monster polynomial in ##t,## ##\sin\theta ## and ##\sin 2\theta.## To claim "one arrives at" seems a bit too optimistic to me. Where does the root come from? It looks as if he put all the trouble I had, and that prevented me from solving it, into these three words. Quite as if he calculated from behind and claimed what he needed to arrive at the correct number.

You are right. What would really be the clue we were looking for is still hidden. I have had all those formulas, too, at one or another stage of my attempts and failed between ##(2)## and ##(3).## To summarize it as "one arrives at" is perky.
 
  • #106
I had something similar:
$$
I=2\int_0^a\left(\int_0^{\sqrt{f(\alpha)f(-\alpha)}} \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}\,dt\right)\,d\alpha\, , \,a=\operatorname{arcsin}\left(1/\sqrt[4]{8}\right)
$$
The problem is the inner integral limit.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K