Integration Method Used to Transform Equation 1 into Equation 2?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the transformation of one equation into another, specifically questioning the integration method used and the appearance of certain terms. Participants explore the mathematical techniques involved in this transformation, including the manipulation of exponential terms within an integral.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the type of integration used to transform equation 1 into equation 2, noting that it does not appear to be integration by parts and inquires about the origin of the term (x-x0).
  • Another participant asserts that no integration was performed, explaining that the transformation involves multiplying the right-hand side by an exponential factor and moving it inside the integral.
  • A different participant reiterates that no integration has occurred, describing a mathematical trick of multiplying and dividing by the same exponential factors, which cancel each other out and can be moved through the integral sign since they do not involve the integration variable k.
  • One participant speculates about the source of the material, suggesting it may be from a Russian book translated into English, indicating a potential cultural or historical context for the discussion.
  • A later reply humorously acknowledges the previous speculation about the source, confirming that the image in question is from David Bohm's Quantum Theory.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether integration has been performed in the transformation, with some asserting that it has not, while others are focused on the implications of the terms involved. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact nature of the transformation.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the mathematical techniques and the definitions of the terms involved, which are not fully explored or clarified.

knockout_artist
Messages
70
Reaction score
2
upload_2016-11-7_15-20-40.png


Hi,

what kind if integration used on equation 1 so it turned into equation 2? this does not look like integration by parts. and where (x-x0) appeared from instead of (k-k0) ?

thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No integration was done. For instance, for the imaginary term, you multiply by the right-hand side by ##\exp[i k_0(x-x_0)] \exp[-i k_0(x-x_0)]##, and move the second exponential inside the integral sign.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: knockout_artist
No integration has been done yet. It's the old mathematical trick of multiplying and dividing by the same thing.
Outside the integral is a factor of
$$\exp\left[-\frac{(x-x_0)^2}2(\Delta k)^2\right]$$
and inside the integral is a factor of the reciprocal
$$\exp\left[\frac{(x-x_0)^2}2(\Delta k)^2\right]$$
These cancel each other out.

They can be freely moved through the integral sign because they do not involve the integration variable ##k##.

EDIT: Darn, Dr Claude jinxed me. Now I'm not allowed to talk for the rest of the day.
 
I bet you are reading from a Russian book translated into English decades ago.
 
dextercioby said:
I bet you are reading from a Russian book translated into English decades ago.
:D I have many of those books too.
But this image is from David Bohm's Quantum Theory.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K